That's right. I don't have any good examples of this but it should work fine.
cheers M On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 02:02:15PM -0700, Jonathan Wilkes wrote: > I think I answered my own question. It looks like I can use CLASS_NOINLET, > then create an inlet explicitly inside the *_new function for my classes. > > On Monday, April 21, 2014 4:49 PM, Jonathan Wilkes <jancs...@yahoo.com> wrote: > > Let's say I have foo_class that creates object [foo] and bar_class which > creates object [bar]. > > I want the inlet of both to forward incoming messages to an object of type > blah_class which serves as a proxy inlet. (The struct of foo and bar would > store a pointer to it and control creation and freeing of it.) > > Is there a way to specify this inside foo_new and bar_new, or is the easiest > way to just use a class_addanything and forward messages that way? > > > -Jonathan > _______________________________________________ > Pd-list@iem.at mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list _______________________________________________ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
