Don't you wish they made something that useful now, instead of the huge jump in price from the f=5.6 70-210 to the 80-200 f=2.8?
Cameron on 12/20/02 5:47 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2002 10:46:24 -0500 > From: Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: SMC PENTAX 85-210mm f3.5 ZOOM?! > Message-id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT > > You're right. That must be very rare. I never heard of it. > Paul > > Bob Rapp wrote: >> >> Hi Paul, >> There were 2 85-210 K zooms. One was f4.5 and identical to the SMC >> Takumar. This one is f3.5! >> >> Bob >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Paul Stenquist" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Sent: Friday, December 20, 2002 12:19 PM >> Subject: Re: SMC PENTAX 85-210mm f3.5 ZOOM?! >> >>> I have both the SMC Takumar version and the SMC Pentax (K) version. >>> They're both excellent. And from among the forty or so lenses that I >>> own, they are the only zooms. >>> Paul >>> >>> Gianfranco Irlanda wrote: >>>> >>>> http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=1946592123 >>>> >>>> I had to check Bojidar's KMP because I couldn't believe it... >>>> Has anybody out there ever used (or simply touched) one of those >>>> beasts? >>>> >>>> Ciao, >>>> >>>> Gianfranco >>>> >>>> ===== >>>>
