Thanks. All my systems have latest IE setup on them. Until now, I've just been more comfortable using Netscape. I tried early version of 6.x and it was too slow on this system. I'll probably give 7.x a shot when I set up the new system next week.
Otis Keith Whaley wrote: > Hi Otis, > > You said: "Communicator 4.79 and it is beginning to have trouble with > a lot of sites..." > > It's NOT NetCOMM that's having the problems. Seems the problem lies > with those who design their sites with IE in mind, and don't bother > about NetCOMM at all. > Many sites have this very same problem. > I used to visit web site where the photos would be viewed in their own > place, with text wrapped around the photos appropriately, and now I > don't. I didn't change my NetCOMM ~ it's the folks NOT taking NetCOMM > into account when they design and debug their sites is what's happened. > > Otis, if you expect Netscape 6.x to work better than 4.79, might as > well switch over to all Explorer right now. > Netscape 6.x is NOT ready for prime time! They've been fussing with it > for years, it seems, and it's never left the beta stage. > Go to the newsgroup site and read all the problems folks have been > having with 6. That's why I stay with 4.79. Neither 6.x nor 7.x have > shown they have even most of the bugs out, and they're still not > reliable as my 4.79 is. > > keith whaley > > "Otis Wright, Jr." wrote: > > > > Ditto. Communicator 4.79 and it is beginning to have trouble with a lot of sites > > where Explorer works OK. I'm putting in a new system next week and will move on >to > > 6.x and if it has problems Netscrape is done at this office. > > > > Otis Wright > > > > Keith Whaley wrote: > > > > > Me, too. Netscape Communicator 4.79. > > > Sad. I'd like to know what lies behind the photo! > > > > > > keith whaley... > > [...]
