From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Because it is too expensive? If so, why do they continue to offer > some really expensive "pro" glass? > > This has always mystified me. Last I looked, Pentax made a 600/4.0, > a 300/2.8, and an 80-200/2.8. Last I looked, the equivalent Nikon and > Canon lenses were CHEAPER.
Even more mystifying considering their refusal to produce a reasonably priced (~$300) non-soft focus 85mm lens. Mark
