From: "frank theriault" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Definitely #2 (the one you showed for PAW). The narrow dof somehow makes it > look older to me - as if it's fading into the past (I know, it's corny, but > it's what I think). > > The other one is technically sound, but doesn't have the "feel" that your > paw has.
Thanks Frank. That's the effect I was going for but I definitely need to reshoot with the light falling on it in a different manner. Mark
