Then there is the problem of holding a small camera properly. I once owned a Minox (don't ask why!), and I certainly didn't think its size made it a nicer camera to use than the ME Super that I owned at the same time.
John
On Thu, 18 Mar 2004 23:46:24 +0300, Mike Ignatiev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
those are design issues, and size is one of the constraints.
mx and me-s are of the same size, but their design differs quite a bit, so you are in effect saying: those small buttons on me-s are because the camera is too small (*)! but those small buttons are only one possible solution, as mx shows.
it's only a matter of creativity of the design team, given the constraints.
and, for one, i would want a small camera. in fact, i would want, ideally,
a vanishingly small tiny camera, provided it takes quality pictures.
mishka
------------ (*) i did like the buttons when i had that camera.
-----Original Message----- From: John Forbes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <...>All these are size issues. Nobody wants a smaller camera.
I think APS may be with us in various flavours for a very long time.
John
-- Using M2, Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/
