Extension needed is very little. Any more than 12 mm and it racks out of focus . . .
On Thursday, March 18, 2004, at 06:51 PM, J. C. O'Connell wrote:


get a bellows then you have adjustable magnification.
jco

----------------------------------------------------------------------- -----
J.C. O'Connell mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://jcoconnell.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------- -----


-----Original Message-----
From: William Robb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2004 7:29 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Slide Dup for *ist D



----- Original Message -----
From: "William M Kane"
Subject: Slide Dup for *ist D


Hey all,

Just received my Slide Holder 1x . K from eBay . . . the seller
has
more (or at least I saw another listed by him) . . . very nice
purchase
. . . brand new in the box,  it even had the plastic bag around it
still!

Anyhow, as I am looking through this I'm imagining there is a
good
chance that this item could be used on the *ist D as a slide copier
. .
. Basically here's the setup:

Camera + 12 mm extension + Reverse Adapter K 52mm + Slide Holder 1x
K

This gives you a mag of 1.00 on a 35 mm system.


Unfortunately we need a lower magnification, and my mind isn't
working
too well right now . . . I figure we either need a lower mag lens
or
higher mag lens, but can't get my brain around the reversed lens .
. .
do we want a 35 mm or an 85 mm lens reversed? I don't have either
in
the 52 mm filter range . . .

So for all you math/lens majors, what lens do we need?

I am pretty sure you are going to need a combination of a longer focal length lens, and more lens extension from both the camera and the slide. I still haven't managed a good slide duping system for the ist D, so if you could report on your experimrnts that would be grand. You could probably use a step down ring on the reverse adaptor and take the lens down to 49mm. If there is a bit of vignetting, it isn't going to matter much, as the format will still be inside the projected circle.

William Robb

William Robb




Reply via email to