Dang. Those are beautiful shots.
rg
Jostein wrote:
Anyone remember the Chinese PUG contributor Aconquija?
He/she submitted to many of the galleries in 2002, and all the submissions
except one were taken with the FA* 70-200/2.8.
Here are links to the ones with this lens:
http://pug.komkon.org/02nov/birch.html
http://pug.komkon.org/02sep/paradise.html
http://pug.komkon.org/02aug/grass.html
http://pug.komkon.org/02jul/lotus.html
http://pug.komkon.org/02may/sp.html
http://pug.komkon.org/02apr/tulip.html
I remember thinking, back then, that if that lens is 10% the reason he can get
such shots, I want one.
Jostein
Quoting Herb Chong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
well, it's better than every other one of my lenses in terms of sharpness
except the FA 50/2.8 macro. my FA 50/1.4 is too new to compare against. at
all zoom positions, it's sharper than the FA* 24/2.
Herb....
----- Original Message -----
From: "Alan Chan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2004 7:34 PM
Subject: Re: FA* 80-200/2.8 discontinued?
I keep reading this but there doesn't seem to have any objective evidence
to
prove the Pentax 2.8 zoom is superior. Not that I don't want to believe,
but
even what I consider the most believable results from photodo doesn't give
that good score (and their results seem to match my experience so far).
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
