Re: Poll Results(long)

[Peter J. Alling]

Like 47% of all statistics he made them up.
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Thanks for posting this.  Your figures seem odd.  With only 10 replies, how
do you arrive at these odd percentage responses?
Shel 

 

[Original Message]
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 11/11/2004 8:58:02 AM
Subject: Poll Results(long)
   

 

7a- What lenses, Pentax or other, do you find DO NOT work well with your
   

camera/shooting
 

style.  (sharpness etc)
   

30% mention the wides are not wide enough now.
10% mention slower than 2.8 is a problem
1% say long primes bring chromayic aberation
1% mention Sigmas 15 f 2.8
1% mention FA 24/2 and FA135/2.8 worked weel on film bodies but not the
       

digital body.
 

The rest say all is well with the lenses they own.
       

8-Has digital taken the place of 35mm film shooting for you
   

50% yes they shoot no film
49% say they shoot film if hi res is needed or important work
1% said nope.
       

 

11-Do you shoot RAW or JPEG or what is needed for the job at hand.
   

RAW 40%
JPG   40%
BOTH 19%
WHATS NEEDED 1%
I noted some shot jpg ONLY if non critical work is being shot, 
or if they have a LOT of images they 
want to shoot. One was to cheap to spring for another 1GIG card.<vbg>
       


 


--
I can understand why mankind hasn't given up war. 
During a war you get to drive tanks through the sides of buildings 
and shoot foreigners - two things that are usually frowned on during peacetime.
	--P.J. O'Rourke