> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Date: 2005/06/08 Wed AM 09:51:57 GMT > To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net > Subject: Re[3]: SMC Pentax M135/3.5 vs SMC Pentac K135/3.5 > > Hello Kostas, > > KK> No, "to have the edge" means to be better, though not by much. > > Thanks for explanation! I was little a bit confused with the "edge" > as in the dictionary I can find two completely different meaning of > this word :) (I'm from Ukraine so English is not my native language).
Which part of Ukraine? I'm working with an organisation from Kremenchug but have not yet had the opportunity to visit. > > >> I'm little a bit confused about all answers. So, whcih one produces > >> better picture? If both of the version 'M' and 'K' will have the same > >> price, which one You'll buy? > > KK> Because I am strange, I would always go for the K. So I did. In this > KK> case, judging from the comments in Stan's site, it is justified to go > KK> for it if you don't mind the (slightly) extra weight/size. > > KK> As for the built in hood, they are never worth it, in my opinion. I > KK> have the clip-on hood for the K and it has a nice feel; I bet it is > KK> also longer than the built-in of the M, while not vignetting. > > Thank You veru much againe. I felt that K versions are almost > slightly better then others (i.e. regarding K28/3.5 and M28/3.5 and > others 28). I just worried about built-in hood as well as simpler > optical formula (4-4 instead of 5-5 in "M" version). > > Thank You! > > -- > Best regards, > dao mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > ----------------------------------------- Email provided by http://www.ntlhome.com/
