.-) That was a nicely phrased warning. I think something like "Warning: naked child" would only make things worse for those who DID look.
OK, maybe I should have warned you, sorry about that. It´s just that the thought didn´t occure to me. I´ve seen naked children running around in many parts of the world, and in many cultures. I think the US is the only place were it can get you into trouble. In principle I think too much self censoring in cases like this is to accept the US rules in the rest of the world. It is a kind of cultural imperialism. This is an international list. Does that mean that we should follow all the cultural dependent taboos in each country, or that the users of this list should do as they do when they travel abroad and just accept that the rules are different here? On the other hand we do not want friends on the list to get into trouble. That is how the self censoring works. Catch 22. In my view this is just an innocent child and if someone manages to thinks anything perverted in relation to it the problem is in their minds. And thanks for the comments! DagT Den 19. jul. 2006 kl. 01.42 skrev Paul Stenquist: > I agree that it's a beautiful photo of an innocent child. But that > being said, I don't want to lose my job. So a warning would be nice. > "Not Office Friendly" is a common and effective one. > Paul > On Jul 18, 2006, at 7:11 PM, Bob W wrote: > >> Well, you know what, the more you accept their view of things the >> more >> they'll impose it on you. >> >> It's a beautiful, innocent picture of a kid having fun, and we should >> all celebrate and enjoy that - there's so little of it left in the >> world. >> >> Anyone who thinks otherwise is a twisted pervert and should go screw >> themselves rather than waste all our time with their mean little >> minds. >> >> -- >> Cheers, >> Bob >> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On >>> Behalf Of Tom C >>> Sent: 18 July 2006 23:51 >>> To: pdml@pdml.net >>> Subject: RE: PESO - Jump >>> >>> Looking at those kind of photos over here will get us in >>> trouble, especially >>> if one pulls it up on a corporate PC as I did, and there >>> happens to be a >>> nosy corporate spy. >>> >>> Tom C. >>> >>> >>> >>>> From: "Bob W" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>> Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <pdml@pdml.net> >>>> To: "'Pentax-Discuss Mail List'" <pdml@pdml.net> >>>> Subject: RE: PESO - Jump >>>> Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 23:28:28 +0100 >>>> >>>> Great photo! >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Cheers, >>>> Bob >>>> >>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On >>>>> Behalf Of DagT >>>>> Sent: 18 July 2006 23:17 >>>>> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>>>> Subject: PESO - Jump >>>>> >>>>> Just a summer picture: >>>>> http://foto.no/cgi-bin/bildekritikk/vis_bilde.cgi?id=247689 >>>>> >>>>> *istD and DA 14mm 2.8 >>>>> >>>>> DagT >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>>>> PDML@pdml.net >>>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>>> PDML@pdml.net >>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>> PDML@pdml.net >>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> PDML@pdml.net >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
