I think the 15mm was a K not A, one of the few things I find forgivable as it would be much easier to restore full K functionality someday...
Adam Maas wrote: > Peter Fairweather wrote: > >> Mark >> >> The answer to your question is the lenses. >> >> In a moment of madness I looked at some of the C****n lens reviews to >> see what was to be gained if anything by switching to the full frame >> 5D. The favourite wide lens was the sigma 12-24, which I have in a >> Pentax mount. I didn't fancy paying £1000 for a 16-35 Canon zoom with >> worse barrel distortion than the Sigma. Their 14mm was twice the price >> of the Pentax and not that well thought of. The 20mm prime was >> indifferent although at least not astronomically expensive. the 24 1.4 >> was excellent but only when stopped down and cost another £1000. The >> 24 2.8 was OK at best and so on >> >> Makes the advantage of a full frame sensor disappear at the wide end. >> I even thought of taking a hacksaw to the Pentax mounts and converting >> them to Canon. >> >> Has anyone ever tried that? ;> ;> >> >> Peter >> >> > > It's called Cotty-izing a lens, as Cotty has done exactly that to an A > 15 and A* 85 for use on his 1DmII. Easier to do now that Cameraquest is > selling a K-EF adaptor (You'll still need to trim the stop-down lever > off to clear the mirror on a FF or 1.3x crop body, but the lever clears > the mirror on EF-S bodies). > > Plenty of people do this to get better Zeiss, Olympus, Nikon or Leica > wides onto the nice canon FF bodies. I personally have the Leica and M42 > adaptors and intend on getting a Nikon adaptor as well (I have a Canon > film body and may get a 5D if I ever get the cash, I've got an extensve > Nikon MF collection that I'd like to use on FF) > > -Adam > > -- Things should be made as simple as possible -- but no simpler. --Albert Einstein -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net