Believe what you will, you obviously haven't been paying attention to
the marketing :"need" for an upgrade path. (Something often cited on
this list as well).
John Forbes wrote:
> On Mon, 01 Jan 2007 15:28:26 -0000, P. J. Alling
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>> If every other manufacture brings out a FF body Pentax will as well or
>> they _will_ _die_. Simple as that.
>>
>
> But the others won't. Simple as that.
>
> And actually it won't affect Pentax. Any "full-frame" bodies would be
> much more expensive, and therefore in a separate market segment that
> Pentax doesn't address. Canon would suffer from the competition, not
> Pentax.
>
> John
>
>
>> John Forbes wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, 31 Dec 2006 12:31:13 -0000, Boris Liberman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> Again, I am not trying to say that DA lenses are not good. I am saying
>>>> that FA Limited are excellent enough for me.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> They may be excellent enough, but are they available in the focal
>>> lengths
>>> you require? (The answer, of course, is No).
>>>
>>> And if you shoot little film, you won't miss much by not being able to
>>> use
>>> your nice DA 21mm on a film body.
>>>
>>> And if you really believe that Pentax is going to bring out a
>>> "full-frame"
>>> digital, then you need to recalibrate your reality grasp. Currently it
>>> is
>>> excessively skewed in the direction of wishful thinking.
>>>
>>> John
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
>
>
--
--
The more I know of men, the more I like my dog.
-- Anne Louise Germaine de Stael
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
