OK On Sun, Mar 2, 2008 at 12:37 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Pentax Photo Lab processed shots may look less noisy, but they lose detail as > well. If you saw the 1600 ISO shots I posted, I think you'd have to agree > that they're coparable to ISO 400 K10D shots in terms of noise -- with no > loss of detail. They're all ACR processed. I have never seen any benefit to > using the Pentax software. In the past or now. ACR used correctly -- or > lightroom, which is the same code -- is far superior. > > Paul > -------------- Original message ---------------------- > From: "David Savage" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Not IMO. > > > > Pics processed with Pentax Photo lab, especially high ISO shots, have > > their noise controlled much better > > > > Shame that the program is such a PITA to use. > > > > CHeers, > > > > Dave > > > > On Sun, Mar 2, 2008 at 12:13 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > ACR works splendidly with the K20D DNG files. > > > Paul > > > > > > > > > -------------- Original message ---------------------- > > > From: "David Savage" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > The K20D .pef formt is different enought that ACR doesn't know what to > > > > do with them. > > > > > > > > I'm waiting for an Adobe update as ACR doesn't seem to handle the RAW > > > > files as well as the supplied Pentax software (urgh) > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > > > Dave > > > > > > -- > > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > > PDML@pdml.net > > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and > follow > > the directions. > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and > follow the directions. >
-- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
