> >> >> From: drew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Tell me about it.... you can imagine how many shutter actuations this >> fellow put on my DL... ;-) >> >> http://picasaweb.google.co.uk/rileyelf/08062008PentaxIst/photo#5209633035513411330 > > Ah, DL. Therein lies the problem. As any fule kno, you can only capture > dragonflies and their ilk with the latest uberkamera and associated > gizmos. In the case of Pentax, this will be the soon never-to-be-released > FF, AS-equipped K1D with the new, equally likely, infinitely short to > infinitely long, infinitely wide consumer priced lens (with or without > SMC) that is capable of being used as a tunneling electron microscope or > galaxy crossing telescope and anything in between. With that setup, you > don't even need to leave your armchair to produce crystal-clear shots of > whatever it is you want. >
After all this time I finally know why my pictures are carp, thanks.... inferior equipemnt! I wondered why many of my pictures were not up to snuff, all this time I figured it was operator error, now I realise that since the KxxD range came out and my *ist-DL became 'obsolete' the pictures it produces must be obsolete also... Perhaps I'll invest in a K1D in infinty years when it is available and I can afford it ;-) Cheers, Drew. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
