On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 09:28:28PM +0800, David Savage wrote: > 2009/4/7 frank theriault <knarftheria...@gmail.com>: > > But you can bang my head with all the numbers and theories you want, > > until I go do it over and over, I'm not going to "get it". Some > > people like the theory behind things, and that's fine, too. But we > > can't forget what the underlying theory is about: going out and > > taking photos! > > Amen! > > All also add that there thousands upon thousand of technically > competent, but mind numbingly boring, photos on the inter web. > > I know, I have added quite a few to the technically competent, but > mediocre, pool myself.
I've done quite a few of those, but they aren't nearly as frustrating as the brilliant photos that were ruined because of a technical error, of which I have quite a few. For sufficiently small values of brilliant that is. Also nice shot of the glowing bunghole. did you do that by timing the flash? Or by aiming a mirror? If you did it with a mirror, you might be able to achieve a similar effect by just taping a mirror to the jeans so her hand didn't need to be there. -- The fastest way to get your question answered on the net is to post the wrong answer. Larry Colen l...@red4est.com http://www.red4est.com/lrc -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
