hm, the problem for me is that i don''t think series of similar photos are often very interesting. not saying that my blending works - it was a bottom-up approach anyway, but i don't think that simple thematising would make it more interesting, or even more coherent. any more opinions?
On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 2:32 AM, Graydon <o...@uniserve.com> wrote: > On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 01:04:36AM +0200, Luka Knezevic-Strika scripsit: >> thanks for your input. encyclopedia of mood(s) sounds like a good title :) > > Well, that's something. > >> but, still, if you have time and are willing, could you give me the >> example of one series which you would reduce this to (the choice is >> yours as to what connects the pictures within it). you could use the >> ordinal numbers from start for communicating the choice. > > There is, alas, no earthly way I've got time to do that. > > I can say that you've got a thread of people-being-oppressed, a thread > of female-people, a thread of black-and-white, a thread of unusual > viewpoints, a thread of hope, and a thread of starkness in there. Which > photo you think goes with which is probably going to be different than > mine, but that's a very broad range of mood to contain in a single > can-be-comprehended-at-one-go gallery. > > -- Graydon > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
