con't... doesn't use Pentax bodies or glass and there's gazillions of fine images created sans Pentax.
Tom C. On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 9:45 AM, Tom C <caka...@gmail.com> wrote: > I do have to say that I'm getting closer to saying 'Screw Pentax', I > don't care about the cost of changing systems, I'm simply tired of > them dicking around, and me dicking around waiting for them to stop > dicking around. > > Regardless of how good certain pieces of Pentax glass may be, it's > easily apparent that the majority of the world doesn't > > On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 9:38 AM, Tom C <caka...@gmail.com> wrote: >> I hope Jostein does not work in the Customer Service department of his >> organization. >> >> Tom C. >> >> On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 9:00 AM, William Robb <war...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Rob Studdert" >>> Subject: Re: On FF and other "must have" features >>> >>> >>>> On 26/02/2010, AlunFoto <alunf...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Find another camera maker, then. One that's better at excuses, if >>>>> nothing else. :-) >>>> >>>> As you may appreciate it's far easier said than done, >>> >>> I find these dismissive comments to be a little less than smart as well. >>> I've been very good to Pentax over the years regarding supporting their lens >>> manufacture, being told to go away and stop bitching because I would like a >>> camera that is as good as what the competition had on the market 5 years ago >>> is unreasonable. >>> >>> William Robb >>> >>> -- >>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>> PDML@pdml.net >>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and >>> follow the directions. >>> >> > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
