OK.

So, after thinking a lot, and more importantly, after going out to
shoot with the 6D and a nice Zeiss 35mm lens, I've decided to stay
with Pentax.

I got some really nice frames from the 6D. The shallower depth of
field is really noticeable to me.

But the camera is bulky, heavy, and so are the lenses. I can see
myself buying this camera and then leaving it at home while I go shoot
with the Leica.

I'll keep waiting for a full frame Pentax MX. I know the technology is
there... I'd be happy with a full frame 10MP camera, MX-sized, similar
viewfinder. Hey, make it all manual and drop the LCD screen, even, I
don't care, as long as mi DNGs are on the SD card when I come back
home. Or course, that's a pipe dream.

In the meantime, the K3 will be a really nice thing to shoot with.
I'll put a Katz Eye screen on it and my viewfinder magnifier.

Now my decision is: do I get the 20-40 with it, or, since it's just a
little bit more money, the 31/1.8, which seems like the ideal normal
lens for these cameras?

j

On Sat, Dec 28, 2013 at 10:01 PM, John <johnsess...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> I was saving up for a full-frame Pentax. Doesn't look like that's in the
> near future, but that's Ok, because some other things came up & wiped out
> the money I was saving for that, setting me back to square one.
>
> Maybe Pentax will have something to offer me by the time I've saved up
> again.
>
>
> On 12/28/2013 12:58 PM, eactiv...@aol.com wrote:
>>
>>
>> The Canon 24/105 is a great lens.
>>
>> Just saying...  Marnie aka Doe :-)  Actually so is the 17-40,  I believe.
>>
>> In a message dated 12/28/2013 8:48:46 A.M. Pacific Standard  Time,
>> juanbuh...@gmail.com writes:
>> Hello all,
>>
>> I don't post here much  anymore, but I decided to ask this because I
>> see a lot of the old names and  the pdml has always been an awesome
>> group of people.
>>
>> As some of you  might know, I've shot with Pentax all my photographic
>> life. Starting with an  ME-Super, going through PZ-1, MX (I still have
>> two black ones!), ZX-n, istD,  K10D, to my current ones, a K5 and a
>> K-01 I bought because it was a really  cheap way to put a sensor behind
>> my lenses.
>>
>> I love the quality and  ergonomics of my Pentax cameras. After all
>> these years, I obviously have a  nice set of lenses. I am currently
>> traveling in South America long term, so I  have a subset of those with
>> me: 12-24 zoom, 21 Limited, FA28/2.8, FA35/2,  FA50/1.7, 17-70 zoom.
>> The first three are my most used ones right now. I also  shoot a lot
>> with a Leica M8 and either a 28 or 35mm lens on it.
>>
>> Now  the time has came to renew my DSLR. Obviously, an option that is
>> up there is  a K3. It seems like a camera I'd love, and given that it's
>> a Pentax, I can  just use it without waiting for my fingers to learn
>> where the controls  are.
>>
>> BUT. I've missed having full frame all this time. I would love to  go
>> back to shooting mostly with a 50mm, because of its shallow depth  of
>> field. I would love to have a big viewfinder, and fast AF  wouldn't
>> hurt. Every time I pick up a Canon, it makes me sad how fast the  AF
>> is. Even way older models, like an original 5D, focuses way faster
>> with  a 50/1.8 than my K5 with a 50/1.7 or 35/2.
>>
>> So I am now trying to make  this decision: get a K3, along with a 20-40
>> (that zoom looks great for photos  in the street!), or get a 60D ($1300
>> at KEH), with a 50/1.8 and possibly a  28/1.8? If I get a Canon, I have
>> lenses available through my girlfriend: a  17-40/4 and a 24-105/4, so I
>> would immediately have a complete  kit.
>>
>> The money spent would be about the same. One option means staying  with
>> a brand I know and love. The other means getting full frame and  state
>> of the art AF, no more little screws on my lenses.
>>
>> I feel like  if I get the 60D I will miss Pentax tremendously. And if I
>> get the K3 I will  love it, and in three months I will be wishing for a
>> full frame K  mount.
>>
>> What says the PDML? It seems like the only good thing about Pentax  not
>> releasing a FF camera is that Cotty's hat is still intact,  no?
>>
>> j
>>
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
> follow the directions.



-- 
Juan Buhler - http://www.jbuhler.com

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to