> On 15 July 2021 at 16:12 Bill <anotherdrunken...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> On 7/15/2021 1:14 AM, mike wilson wrote:
> > 
> >> On 15 July 2021 at 07:49 Larry Colen <l...@red4est.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> It looks like Ricoh is coming out with a new version of the 16-50:
> >>
> >> http://www.ricoh-imaging.co.jp/english/products/star_lens/special/sp_da16-50/interview/
> >>
> >> My first thought is that they really ought to have made it a 15-50 or some 
> >> other adjustment to the range just so it isn’t confused for the original.
> >>
> >> I also note that this bodes well for K-3 iii owners, but maybe not so well 
> >> for the K-1 crowd.
> >>
> >> In any case, it will be interesting to see how it actually performs once 
> >> it is available.
> > 
> > I must admit to a burning curiosity over the "strict standards of the 
> > next-generation star series" which, without the benefit of futuresight, I 
> > would have described as theoretical aspirations.  Or maybe I just woke up 
> > particularly skeptical this morning.
> 
> You just haven't been paying attention. The Star series lenses are 
> moving towards optical performance with no compromises, and sufficiently 
> high optical standards to be able to support much higher pixel densities.

Sounds like an aspiration to me.
> 
> One of the things I noticed when moving up the pixel count ladder was 
> that lenses that were great at 6mp became lens and less good as the 
> pixel count increased and their weaknesses were exaggerated. Ricoh is 
> making the new Star lenses to a much higher optical standard in an 
> attempt to future proof the designs as much as possible.

And again.
> 
> And yes, they are also moving towards being very expensive objects. The 
> price of admission for the 16-50 will be in the US$2k range, which is a 
> significant price jump from the just over US$1k price of the lens it is 
> replacing.

My aspiration is to have the pennies to play in the deep end of the pool.
--
%(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List
To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-le...@pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to