Info about subscribing or unsubscribing from this list is at the bottom of this 
message.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

For a much longer, more-detailed version of this article, see:

http://multinationalmonitor.org/mm2004/122004/mokhiber.html

---------------

The 10 Worst Corporations of 2004
By Russell Mokhiber and Robert Weissman

When the Multinational Monitor judges gather to pick the 10 worst
corporations of the year, one of their instructions is: name no companies
that appeared on the previous year's list (barring extraordinary
circumstances).

For the 2004 list, that means no Bayer (even though in 2004 the company
pushed for import of genetically modified rice into the European Union,
polluted water in a South African town with the carcinogen hexavalent
chromium, and was hit with evidence that its pain medication Aleve
(naproxen) increases the risk of heart attack, among other egregious
acts), no Boeing  (despite new evidence that the tanker plane scandal
costing U.S. taxpayers tens of billions of dollars is even worse than it
appeared), no Clear Channel (even though the radio behemoth in 2004
stooped to new lows with a "Breast Christmas Ever" contest that promised
to pay for breast implants for a dozen contest "winners"), and no
Halliburton (embroiled in a whole new set of contracting fraud and bribery
charges in 2004).

But at least the no-repeat rule helps limit the field a bit.

And there remained plenty of worthy candidates.

Of the remaining pool of price gougers, polluters, union-busters,
dictator-coddlers, fraudsters, poisoners, deceivers and general
miscreants, we chose the following -- presented in alphabetical order --
as the 10 Worst Corporations of 2004 [full text available at
http://www.multinationalmonitor.org]:

Abbott Laboratories: Abbott makes the list for raising the price of
Norvir, an important AIDS drug, developed with a major infusion of U.S.
government funds, by 400 percent. The price increase doesn't apply if
Norvir is purchased in conjunction with another Abbott drug, giving Abbott
an unfair advantage over competitors and tilting consumers to use the
Abbott products on the basis of price.

AIG: The world's largest insurer, American International Group Inc. (AIG)
was charged in October with aiding and abetting PNC Financial Services in
a fraudulent transaction to transfer $750 million in mostly troubled loans
and venture capital investments from subsidiaries off of its books. AIG
agreed to pay $126 million to resolve the charges, but it got off light,
entering into a "deferred prosecution agreement" -- meaning the charges
against the company will be dropped in 12 months time if it abides by the
terms of the agreement.

Coca-Cola: Workers at the Coke bottling plant in Colombia have been
terrorized for years by right-wing paramilitary forces. A fact-finding
mission headed by a New York City Council member found, among other
abuses, "there have been a total of 179 major human rights violations of
Coca-Cola's workers, including nine murders. Family members of union
activists have been abducted and tortured." Coke says it opposes the
anti-union violence and in any case that it hasn't had control of the
bottling plant (though it does now, after purchasing the Colombian
bottling company). Coke's former general counsel, and the former assistant
U.S. attorney general, Deval Patrick, resigned in 2004, reportedly in part
because Coke refused to support an independent investigation into the
Colombia allegations.

Dow Chemical: The world's largest plastic maker, Dow purchased Union
Carbide in 1999. At midnight on December 2, 1984, 27 tons of lethal gases
leaked from Union Carbide's pesticide factory in Bhopal, India,
immediately killing an estimated 8,000 people and poisoning thousands of
others. Today in Bhopal, at least 150,000 people, including children born
to parents who survived the disaster, are suffering from exposure-related
health effects such as cancer, neurological damage, chaotic menstrual
cycles and mental illness. Dow refuses to take any responsibility. In a
statement, the company says, "Although Dow never owned nor operated the
plant, we -- along with the rest of industry -- have learned from this
tragic event, and we have tried to do all we can to assure that similar
incidents never happen again."

GlaxoSmithKline: Following revelations and regulatory action in the UK in
2003 and 2004, the story of the severe side effects from Glaxo's Paxil (as
well as other drugs in the same family) -- notably that they are addictive
and lead to increased suicidality in youth -- finally broke in the United
States in 2004. In June, New York Attorney General Eliot Spitzer filed
suit against Glaxo, charging the giant drug maker with suppressing
evidence of Paxil's harm to children, and misleading physicians. Glaxo
denied the charges, but agreed to a new system whereby it would make
public results all of its clinical trials. In October, the U.S. Food and
Drug Administration ordered Glaxo and makers of drugs in Paxil's class to
include a "black box" warning -- the agency's strongest -- with their
pills.

Hardee's: The fast-food maker is bragging about how unhealthy is its
latest culinary invention, the Monster Thickburger: "First there were
burgers. Then there were Thickburgers. Now Hardee's is introducing the
mother of all burgers -- the Monster Thickburger. Weighing in at
two-thirds of a pound, this 100 percent Angus beef burger is a monument to
decadence." The Monster Thickburger is a 1,420-calorie sandwich. Eating
one Thickburger is like eating two Big Macs or five McDonald's hamburgers.
Add 600 calories worth of Hardee's fries and you get more than the 2,000
calories that many people should eat in a whole day, according to Michael
Jacobson of the Center for Science in the Public Interest, which calls the
Thickburger "food porn."

Merck: Dr. David Graham, a Food and Drug Administration (FDA) drug safety
official, calls it "maybe the single greatest drug-safety catastrophe in
the history of this country." Testifying before a Senate committee in
November, Dr. David Graham put the number in the United States who had
suffered heart attacks or stroke as result of taking the arthritis drug
Vioxx in the range of 88,000 to 139,000. As many as 40 percent of these
people, or about 35,000-55,000, died as a result, Graham said. The
unacceptable cardiovascular risks of Vioxx were evident as early as 2000
-- a full four years before the drug was finally withdrawn from the market
by its manufacturer, Merck, according to a study released by The Lancet,
the British medical journal. Merck says it disclosed all relevant evidence
on Vioxx safety as soon as it acquired it, and pulled the drug as soon as
it saw conclusive evidence of the drug's dangers.

McWane: McWane Inc. is a large, privately held Alabama-based sewer and
water pipe manufacturer. In a devastating series, the New York Times
revealed the company's egregious safety record, and the utter failure of
regulatory agencies to control the company's workplace violence. Nine
McWane employees have lost their lives in workplace accidents since 1995
-- and three of the deaths were the result of deliberate company
violations of safety standards. More than 4,600 injuries were recorded
among the company's 5,000 employees. According to the Times, McWane pulled
the wool over the eyes of investigators by stalling them at the factory
gates, and then hiding defective equipment. Accident sites were altered
before investigators could inspect them, in violation of federal rules.
When government enforcement officials did find serious violations, the
Times reported, "the punishment meted out by the federal government was so
minimal that McWane could treat it as simply a cost of doing business."

Riggs Bank: An explosive report from the U.S. Senate Permanent
Subcommittee on Investigations of the Committee on Governmental Affairs,
issued in July, revealed that the Washington, D.C.-based Riggs Bank
illegally operated bank accounts for former Chilean dictator Augusto
Pinochet, and routinely ignored evidence of corrupt practices in managing
more than 60 accounts for the government of Equatorial Guinea. Although
these and other activities seem to violate U.S. banking rules, the Office
of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) did not take enforcement action
against the bank after it learned of these matters in 2002. That
presumably was not unrelated to the fact that the OCC examiner at Riggs
soon thereafter went to work for Riggs. In May 2004, the bank paid $25
million in fines in connection with money-laundering violations related to
the Equatorial Guinea and Saudi Arabian governments, and it is the subject
of ongoing federal criminal investigations.

Wal-Mart: While Wal-Mart is presently on a bit of a public relations
defensive, the company remains the colossus of U.S. -- and increasingly
global -- retailing. It registers more than a quarter trillion dollars in
sales. Its revenues account for 2 percent of U.S. Gross Domestic Product.
For two years running, Fortune has named Wal-Mart the most admired company
in America. It is arguably the defining company of the present era. A key
component -- arguably the key component -- of the company's business model
is undercompensating employees and externalizing costs on to society. A
February 2004 report issued by Representative George Miller, D-California,
tabulated some of those costs. The report estimated that one 200-person
Wal-Mart store may result in a cost to federal taxpayers of $420,750 per
year -- about $2,103 per employee. These public costs include free and
reduced lunches for just 50 qualifying Wal-Mart families, Section 8
housing assistance, federal tax credits and deductions for low-income
families, and federal contributions to health insurance programs for
low-income children.


Russell Mokhiber is editor of the Washington, D.C.-based Corporate Crime
Reporter, (http://www.corporatecrimereporter.com). Robert Weissman is
editor of the Washington, D.C.-based Multinational Monitor,
(http://www.multinationalmonitor.org), and counsel for Essential
Inventions, a nonprofit involved in the pricing dispute discussed in the
Abbott profile. Mokhiber and Weissman are co-authors of On the Rampage:
Corporate Predators and the Destruction of Democracy (Monroe, Maine:
Common Courage Press).

_____________________________

Note: This message comes from the peace-justice-news e-mail mailing list of 
articles and commentaries about peace and social justice issues, activism, etc. 
 If you do not regularly receive mailings from this list or have received this 
message as a forward from someone else and would like to be added to the list, 
send a blank e-mail with the subject "subscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
or you can visit:
http://lists.enabled.com/mailman/listinfo/peace-justice-news  Go to that same 
web address to view the list's archives or to unsubscribe.

E-mail accounts that become full, inactive or out of order for more than a few 
days will be deleted from this list.

FAIR USE NOTICE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the 
information in this e-mail is distributed without profit to those who have 
expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational 
purposes.  I am making such material available in an effort to advance 
understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, 
scientific, and social justice issues, etc. I believe this constitutes a 'fair 
use' of copyrighted material as provided for in the US Copyright Law.

Reply via email to