Info about subscribing or unsubscribing from this list is at the bottom of this 
message.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

http://snipurl.com/gg1e

July 20, 2005
New York Times

Iraqi Constitution May Curb Women's Rights
By EDWARD WONG

BAGHDAD, Iraq, July 19 - A working draft of Iraq's new constitution would
cede a strong role to Islamic law and could sharply curb women's rights,
particularly in personal matters like divorce and family inheritance.

The document's writers are also debating whether to drop or phase out a
measure enshrined in the interim constitution, co-written last year by the
Americans, requiring that women make up at least a quarter of the
parliament.

The draft of a chapter of the new constitution obtained by The New York
Times on Tuesday guarantees equal rights for women as long as those rights
do not "violate Shariah," or Koranic law.

The Americans and secular Iraqis banished such explicit references to
religious law from the interim constitution adopted early last year.

The draft chapter, circulated discreetly in recent days, has ignited
outrage among women's groups, which held a protest on Tuesday morning in
downtown Baghdad at the square where a statue of Saddam Hussein was pulled
down by American marines in April 2003.

One of the critical passages is in Article 14 of the chapter, a sweeping
measure that would require court cases dealing with matters like marriage,
divorce and inheritance to be judged according to the law practiced by the
family's sect or religion.

Under that measure, Shiite women in Iraq, no matter what their age,
generally could not marry without their families' permission. Under some
interpretations of Shariah, men could attain a divorce simply by stating
their intention three times in their wives' presence.

Article 14 would replace a body of Iraqi law that has for decades been
considered one of the most progressive in the Middle East in protecting
the rights of women, giving them the freedom to choose a husband and
requiring divorce cases to be decided by a judge.

If adopted, the shift away from the more secular and egalitarian
provisions of the interim constitution would be a major victory for Shiite
clerics and religious politicians, who chafed at the Americans' insistence
that Islam be designated in the interim constitution as just "a source" of
legislation. Several writers of the new constitution say they intend, at
the very least, to designate Islam as "a main source" of legislation.

By rough count, nearly 200 women and men showed up in the fiery heat to
hand out fliers and wave white banners in a throng of traffic. "We want to
be equal to everybody - we want human rights for everybody," read one
slogan. The demonstration came hours before two Sunni Arabs involved in
writing the constitution were fatally shot near a Baghdad restaurant,
threatening to throw the drafting process into turmoil.

"We want a guarantee of women's rights in the new constitution," said
Hannah Edwar, an organizer of the protest. "We're going to meet with the
constitutional committee and make our thoughts known."

A dozen women, some sheathed in full-length black robes, showed up to
denounce Ms. Edwar's protest. They said they were followers of Moktada
al-Sadr, the fundamentalist Shiite cleric who has led two rebellions
against the Americans.

American and Iraqi officials say that several draft chapters of the
constitution are floating around Baghdad and that no final language has
been agreed on. Changes can still be made before Aug. 15, the deadline for
the National Assembly to approve a draft. Protests by women and relatively
secular blocs on the constitutional committee, like the Kurds, may force
Shiite members to tone down the religious language.

"Some of the points regarding women's rights in this chapter are still to
be reviewed," said Mariam Arayess, a religious Shiite on the committee.

Ms. Arayess said she believed that the draft was the most recent working
version, and that it had fairly generous provisions for equal rights. She
is one of fewer than 10 women on the 71-member drafting committee.

The chapter has 27 articles, most of which have relatively liberal
provisions aimed at ensuring various civil rights. The first says that
"all Iraqis are equal before the law" and that "equal opportunities are
guaranteed for all citizens according to the law." The final article
forbids censorship of the press.

References to Islam and Shariah appear in a few places. One clause says
Iraqis will enjoy all rights stated in "international treaties and
conventions as long as they do not contradict Islam." Such language is
accepted by many Iraqis, including moderates, who say Islam is a vital
foundation for the country.

But women's groups are incensed by Article 14, which would repeal a
relatively liberal personal status law enacted in 1959 after the
British-backed monarchy was overthrown by secular military officers. That
law remained in effect through the decades of Mr. Hussein's rule.

The law used Shariah to adjudicate personal and family matters, but did it
in as secular a manner as possible, pulling together the most liberal
interpretations of Koranic law from the main Shiite and Sunni sects and
stitching them together into one code.

Critics of the draft proposal say that in addition to restricting women's
rights, it could also deepen the sectarian divide between Sunnis and
Shiites. The draft also does not make clear what would happen in cases
where the husband is from one sect and the wife from another.

Religious Shiite politicians tried once before, in December 2003, to
abolish the 1959 law. As is happening now, women's groups and secular
female politicians took to the streets.

Faced with the mini-rebellion, L. Paul Bremer III, then the effective
American proconsul of Iraq, rebuffed the move, to the anger and dismay of
many religious Shiites.

"We don't want to use separate Sunni or Shiite laws," said Dohar Rouhi,
president of the Association of Women Entrepreneurs. "We want a law that
can be applied to everyone. We want justice for women."

A Westerner familiar with the writing of the constitution said that when
he saw a draft of the civil rights section less than a week ago, it did
not contain the sweeping language on personal status law. In that version,
he said, most measures - even those citing Shariah - were not as severe as
they could have been.

"Compared to what some of the conservative Shiites were pushing, the glass
is half full," said the Westerner, who would speak only on condition of
anonymity, because he did not want to appear to be interfering in a
sovereign Iraqi process.

He said there was some cause for alarm, though, pointing to a proposal to
phase out a measure in the interim constitution requiring that a quarter
of parliamentary seats go to women.

Ms. Arayess, the Shiite drafter, said some of the writers were considering
keeping the quota for the next two terms of the parliament before allowing
it to lapse. After that, she said, women should be able to stand on their
own.

_____________________________

Note: This message comes from the peace-justice-news e-mail mailing list of 
articles and commentaries about peace and social justice issues, activism, etc. 
 If you do not regularly receive mailings from this list or have received this 
message as a forward from someone else and would like to be added to the list, 
send a blank e-mail with the subject "subscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] or you 
can visit:
http://lists.enabled.com/mailman/listinfo/peace-justice-news  Go to that same 
web address to view the list's archives or to unsubscribe.

E-mail accounts that become full, inactive or out of order for more than a few 
days will become disabled or deleted from this list.

FAIR USE NOTICE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the 
information in this e-mail is distributed without profit to those who have 
expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational 
purposes.  I am making such material available in an effort to advance 
understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, 
scientific, and social justice issues, etc. I believe this constitutes a 'fair 
use' of copyrighted material as provided for in the US Copyright Law.

Reply via email to