Info about subscribing or unsubscribing from this list is at the bottom of this 
message.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

(fwd)

Uncorroborated, but too interesting to pass up...


http://www.alternet.org/bloggers/frel/27082/
Fitzgerald gossip straight from my inbox

I just got this e-mail from a Democratic House member's staffer with tons
of good dirt on the Plame investigation. I'm reprinting it whole cloth to
share all, and show that while these Hill staffers are well-informed, they
sure could use some capitalization classes.

Among the things I hadn't seen before:

-Fred Flights, an assistant to John Bolton, is a named name who could be
indicted.

-Sens. John McCain and Lindsey Graham have been suggested as replacements
for Dick Cheney.

-Colin Powell told John McCain he showed the infamous memo with Plame's
identity on it two just two people; Dick Cheney and George Bush.

-Fitzgerald is looking at the precedent set from the indictment of Tricky
Dick's veep Spiro Agnew to pursue against Cheney.

That's red meat folks.


Text of the e-mail:

below, some extremely sensitive information about the impending conclusion
of the valerie plame investigations. the sources include two senior
members of senate and key staffers; counsel for individuals that have been
called before the grand jury; and two journalists taking a lead position
in investigating the case. the following represents a composite of the
information from those sources.

plamegate coming to conclusion. the investigation has focused mostly
closely on vice president cheney and his staff, as well as us ambassador
to the un (and former undersecretary of state for arms control) john
bolton and his staff. we are told that eight indictments have already
prepared, with the possibility of another ten. these indictments include
senior white house staff, most notably vice president cheney's chief of
staff scooter libby, fred flights (special assistant to john bolton),
and--very surprisingly--national security adviser steve hadley.
apparently, libby and hadley have both been told by their lawyers to
expect indictments. the indictment of senior bush political advisor karl
rove seems highly probable.

most critically, a plea bargain process has evidently been opened with
vice president cheney's lawyer. that does not mean that an indictment is
coming. but i've some critical background around the issue.

in the past several days, former secretary of state colin powell had a
meeting with senator john mccain (R-AZ), primarily about the
mccain-sponsored amendment on inserting a rider prohibiting torture onto
the us defense budget (a bill which powell has himself been lobbying
heavily for, against objections of president bush).

during the meeting, powell recounted to the senator that he had traveled
on air force one with bush and cheney, and brought to their attention a
classified memorandum about the issue of whether there was indeed a
transaction inolving niger and yellow cake uranium. the document included
ambassador joe wilson's involvement and identified his wife, valerie
plame, as a covert agent. the memorandum further stated that this
information was secret. powell told mccain that he showed that memo only
to two people--president and vice president. according to powell, cheney
fixated on the wilson/plame connection, and plame's status.

powell testified about this exchange in great length to the grand jury
investigating the plame case. according to sources close to the case,
powell appeared convinced that the vice president played a focal role in
disclosing plame's undercover status.

in his conversation with mccain, powell felt that--at a minimum--there
would be a serious shakeup at national security council as a consequence.
in particular, vice president cheney would no longer hold a pivotal role
in us national security affairs. powell apparently did not discuss the
potential of a cheney resignation.

lead prosecutor patrick fitzgerald has apparently been looking at the
precedent of formerly indicted nixon vice president spiro agnew. this
shows the likely path, because addressing executive immunity and privilege
questions would necessarily begin start with a plea-bargain deal that
would entail a resignation.

this is all likely to occur within the next week. 28 october (next friday)
is the last day of the grand jury, and no requests have been made to
extend their session. the investigator is expecting to wrap up by then.

there are enormous implication for what would be the biggest white house
shakeup since the iran-contra scandal in the reagan era. president bush's
approval rating at 39% has already led to a significant decrease in policy
efficacy with key legislators in congress. i'll spin out the broader
policy implications when i have some time to write at greater length, but
i wanted to get this out immediately.

one interesting point though--it is worth noting that a parade of senior
republican senators have evidently been privately pushing mccain to lobby
to be cheney's replacement. senator lindsey graham (R-SC) has also been
mentioned. meanwhile, the white house has already been developing
countermeasures--notably including senior white house officials privately
voicing president bush's disappointment in karl rove's involvement in the
case, calling it "misconduct." an urgent search for a rove replacement is
already underway.

_____________________________

Note: This message comes from the peace-justice-news e-mail mailing list of 
articles and commentaries about peace and social justice issues, activism, etc. 
 If you do not regularly receive mailings from this list or have received this 
message as a forward from someone else and would like to be added to the list, 
send a blank e-mail with the subject "subscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] or you 
can visit:
http://lists.enabled.com/mailman/listinfo/peace-justice-news  Go to that same 
web address to view the list's archives or to unsubscribe.

E-mail accounts that become full, inactive or out of order for more than a few 
days will become disabled or deleted from this list.

FAIR USE NOTICE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the 
information in this e-mail is distributed without profit to those who have 
expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational 
purposes.  I am making such material available in an effort to advance 
understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, 
scientific, and social justice issues, etc. I believe this constitutes a 'fair 
use' of copyrighted material as provided for in the US Copyright Law.

Reply via email to