Info about subscribing or unsubscribing from this list is at the bottom of this 
message.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

http://www.inthesetimes.com/site/main/article/2412/

White Phosphorous Lies:
Did the Pentagon use chemical weapons indiscriminately in Fallujah?

By Frida Berrigan, November 23, 2005
In These Times

Just when it seemed the Iraq war couldn't get worse, the United States
admitted on November 16 that forces in Fallujah did use white phosphorus
(WP) as an incendiary weapon against enemy combatants. However, the
Pentagon continues to deny that soldiers used WP--a "spontaneously
flammable" and "extremely toxic inorganic substance," according to the
Army Center for Health Promotion and Preventative Medicine--against
civilians.

This admission, a reversal of the military's previous denials that the
substance was used as a weapon at all, came after protests at the U.S.
embassy in Rome that were sparked by the airing of Fallujah: The Hidden
Massacre, a documentary by Sigfrido Ranucci and Maurizio Torrealta, on
Italian television.

In the documentary, Torrealta, a news editor at Italian state media
company RAI, interviews U.S. soldiers and Iraqi human rights advocates,
and shows pictures of the havoc wreaked by white phosphorus. The film set
off a firestorm of controversy about interpretations of the Geneva
Convention: When is a device that can indiscriminately burn civilians to
death a banned weapon and when is it a defensive mechanism for hiding
troop movements? An Army fact sheet admits it is both, noting that while
WP "is used primarily as a smoke agent," it can "also function as an
anti-personnel flame compound capable of causing serious burns."

For Jeff Engelhart, a former Marine with the First Infantry Division that
fought the Battle of Fallujah in November 2004, these questions of
interpretation are moot. "I do know that white phosphorus was used. White
phosphorus kills indiscriminately," he says in the documentary.

On November 8, U.S. Marine Major Tim Keefe told Reuters that "suggestions
that U.S. forces targeted civilians with these weapons are simply wrong."
But there is nothing simple about it.

Protocol III of the 1980 Convention on Conventional Weapons bans the use
of incendiary weapons, meaning "any weapon or munition which is primarily
designed to set fire to objects or to cause burn injury to persons." The
United States has not signed the protocol. The Pentagon initially denied
using WP as a weapon, arguing that while WP could "set fire to objects or
cause burn injury to persons," that is not the task for which the weapon
is "primarily designed." Rather, the military claims that WP--known as
"Whiskey Pete," or "Willy Pete" on the battlefield--is a legitimate tool
for obscuring troop actions. Now military sources insist that WP is not a
chemical weapon (banned under Geneva Conventions), but a conventional one.

>From the military's own reports, it is clear white phosphorus was used for
multiple reasons in Fallujah. In the March/April 2005 issue of Field and
Artillery Magazine, Captain James T. Cobb wrote an "after action" review
of the November 2004 Battle of Fallujah, a battle he describes as the
"most fierce urban fighting for Marines since the Battle of Hue City in
Vietnam in 1968."

Cobb and his co-authors continue, "White phosphorus proved to be an
effective and versatile munition," useful as "a potent psychological
weapon against the insurgents ... We fired 'shake and bake' missions at
insurgents, using WP to flush out them out and HE [high explosives] to
take them out."

It is also clear that U.S. Marines fired WP indiscriminately in Fallujah.
Darrin Mortenson, a reporter for the San Diego-area North County Times,
was embedded with the Camp Pendleton Marines in Fallujah. In an April 11,
2004 article, Mortenson describes a daily pattern that escalated during
the Battle of Fallujah. Nicholas Bogert, a 22-year-old mortar team leader,
directs his team to fire countless rounds of "shake and bake" into
Fallujah neighborhoods, "never knowing what the targets were or what
damage the resulting explosions caused."

In a November 8 interview with "Democracy Now," Torrealta said that he
began his investigation after seeing photographs from the Studies Centre
of Human Rights & Democracy in Fallujah, including detailed color images
of residents, some dead in their beds, with their clothes largely intact,
but their skin melted to the consistency of leather.

In the same program, Lieutenant Colonel Steve Boylan, a spokesman for the
U.S. military in Iraq, said that the allegations of WP's use against
civilians was "tantamount to propaganda, falsehood and rumors."

When asked about the photos of people burned to the bone while their
clothing remained untouched, he theorizes that the damage could have been
inflicted by a suicide bomber. "That can happen from massive explosions.
If you look at the car bombs that the terrorists use today, you have the
same effects from car bombs [or] from suicide vests."

Boylan may assert that the use of WP is legal and worth the price paid by
civilians. But James Nachtwey, the award-winning war photographer, wrote
in 1985 that if everyone "could see for themselves what white phosphorus
does to the face of a child ... they would understand that nothing is
worth letting things get to the point where that happens to even one
person, let alone thousands."


Frida Berrigan is a senior research associate with the Arms Trade Resource
Center, a project of the World Policy Institute.

_____________________________

Note: This message comes from the peace-justice-news e-mail mailing list of 
articles and commentaries about peace and social justice issues, activism, etc. 
 If you do not regularly receive mailings from this list or have received this 
message as a forward from someone else and would like to be added to the list, 
send a blank e-mail with the subject "subscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] or you 
can visit:
http://lists.enabled.com/mailman/listinfo/peace-justice-news  Go to that same 
web address to view the list's archives or to unsubscribe.

E-mail accounts that become full, inactive or out of order for more than a few 
days will become disabled or deleted from this list.

FAIR USE NOTICE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the 
information in this e-mail is distributed without profit to those who have 
expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational 
purposes.  I am making such material available in an effort to advance 
understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, 
scientific, and social justice issues, etc. I believe this constitutes a 'fair 
use' of copyrighted material as provided for in the US Copyright Law.

Reply via email to