Info about subscribing or unsubscribing from this list is at the bottom of this 
message.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

http://www.organicconsumers.org/rd/clones.htm

TAKE ACTION: FDA APPROVES FOOD FROM CLONES

Despite a September survey found that 64% of Americans are repulsed by the
idea of eating food from cloned animals, the FDA announced [recently] that
milk, eggs and meat from cloned animals will soon be allowed on the
market.

Ignoring a number of disturbing studies suggesting potential human health
hazards, Stephen F. Sundlof, director of the FDA Center for Veterinary
Medicine said "that meat and milk from cattle, swine and goat clones is as
safe to eat as the food we eat every day." Consumer, food safety, and
animal welfare groups have condemned the announcement, pointing out that
animal cloning is inherently unpredictable and hazardous, and that the
practice of cloning has led to a high number of cruel and painful
deformities in the experimental animals' offspring.

Recognizing that requiring labels on cloned food would lead to a massive
boycott by consumers, FDA bowed to industry lobbyists by stating that
there likely will be no required labeling of food products containing
ingredients from cloned animals. The FDA's controversial proposed
regulations in the Federal Register will now be followed by a three month
public comment period.

The Organic Consumers' Association is calling on health and humane-minded
consumers across the nation to stop this outrageous and hazardous
regulation from coming into force as federal law. The FDA will be
accepting comments until April 2007.

Send a message to the FDA at http://www.organicconsumers.org/rd/clones.htm

----------

http://www.foodandwaterwatch.org/

Approval of Cloned Food Leaves Consumers Unprotected
By Wenonah Hauter
Food & Water Watch, 12.28.06

Statement of Wenonah Hauter, executive director of Food & Water Watch

WASHINGTON, D.C. – The Food and Drug Administration’s decision to allow
the sale of meat and milk from cloned animals is yet another example of
the agency’s willingness to disregard safety in the face of industry
pressure.
The safety of eating milk and meat from cloned animals is far from proven
, with only a handful of studies and little long-term evidence.  Concerns
about the lack of data on eating food from cloned animals led the National
Academy of Sciences in 2004 to state that “the paucity of evidence in the
literature on this topic makes it impossible to provide scientific
evidence to support this position [that the food from cloned animals
should be approved].” But apparently, this skimpy body of evidence is
enough for FDA to allow these products onto consumers’ dinner tables.

Aside from human health concerns, many people have ethical objections
about cloning animals. A 2004 Gallup poll revealed that 64% of Americans
believe that cloning animals for food is “morally wrong.”  This strong
opposition to the technology makes it even more important that cloned
foods are labeled so concerned consumers can avoid them.  Yet the FDA is
not planning to require labeling of products from cloned animals.

The low survival rate and high number of deformities in cloned animals
also raise significant concerns about cruelty to animals.  Studies of
cloned animals show survival rates as low as five percent and in those
that survive, health problems including organ malformation, digestive
problems, and weakened immune systems.

We are also concerned by FDA’s apparent unwillingness to consider negative
information about cloning.  The Associated Press recently reported the
story of Greg Wiles, a Maryland farmer who was the first to have a
commercial clone on a dairy farm.  Wiles has been trying to alert federal
officials about a number of health problems experienced by his animals,
while complying with the FDA’s voluntary moratorium on placing milk and
meat from cloned animals into the food supply.  He has attempted over the
last several years to bring this matter to the attention of federal
regulators, only to be rebuffed in his attempts to have his cloned animals
fully evaluated and used in research.

Numerous ethical and safety concerns about cloned food products were cited
in a petition filed with FDA by a number of public interest groups in
October.  The petition called on the agency to enact a moratorium on foods
produced from cloned animals and establish rules for reviewing food safety
and environmental impacts before these products are sold to consumers. The
petition also called for the establishment of a committee to advise FDA on
the ethical issues involved.

Rather than allowing cloned products to be sold to consumers, the agency
should take the actions requested in the petition.  It is too soon for
this controversial technology to be unleashed in the marketplace.

If meat and milk from cloned animals do reach the marketplace, Congress
should instruct FDA to require labeling so consumers have the information
they need if they wish to avoid eating this poorly understood new
technology.
_____________________________

Note: This message comes from the peace-justice-news e-mail mailing list of 
articles and commentaries about peace and social justice issues, activism, etc. 
 If you do not regularly receive mailings from this list or have received this 
message as a forward from someone else and would like to be added to the list, 
send a blank e-mail with the subject "subscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] or you 
can visit:
http://lists.enabled.com/mailman/listinfo/peace-justice-news  Go to that same 
web address to view the list's archives or to unsubscribe.

E-mail accounts that become full, inactive or out of order for more than a few 
days will become disabled or deleted from this list.

FAIR USE NOTICE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the 
information in this e-mail is distributed without profit to those who have 
expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational 
purposes.  I am making such material available in an effort to advance 
understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, 
scientific, and social justice issues, etc. I believe this constitutes a 'fair 
use' of copyrighted material as provided for in the US Copyright Law.

Reply via email to