Info about subscribing or unsubscribing from this list is at the bottom of this 
message.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

http://www.gregpalast.com

Bush Hit-Woman Behind Prosecutor Firings Has Long History of Purges to
Protect Bush:  Harriet Miers fired investigator in 1997 to cover Bush
draft-dodge

Published March 14th, 2007

by Greg Palast
from the original reports for BBC Television and the Guardian (UK)

The Mister Big behind the scandal of George Bush’s firing of US Attorneys
is not a ‘mister’ at all. The House Judiciary Committee has released White
House emails indicating that the political operative who ordered the hit
on prosecutors too honest for their own good was Harriet Miers, one-time
legal counsel to the President.

But this is not the first time that Miers has fired investigators to
protect Mr. Bush.

In 1999, while investigating Governor George Bush of Texas for the
Guardian papers of Britain, I obtained an extraordinary, and
extraordinarily confidential, memo to the US Attorney’s office in Austin.
It disclosed that, in 1997, Governor Bush secretly suggested to the
chairwoman of the Texas Lottery Commission that she grant a contract to
the client of a Bush ally.

The Governor’s back-door demand to the Lottery chairwoman was not so easy.
Bush wanted the Lottery to grant a multi-billion dollar contract to GTech
Corporation. But GTech hadn’t even bid on the contract - and a winner was
already announced.

There was only way for the Chairwoman to carry out the fix: fire the
director of the Lottery who had discouraged GTech from bidding because of
its history of corruption.

The Chairwoman, Harriet Miers, did the deed: fired the Lottery director;
Miers then ignored the winning bid — and gave Bush’s favored company the
contract, no bidding, in perpetuity.

Miers and the Draft

Neither Miers nor President Bush have ever denied the contents of the memo
[I’ve posted it here] despite repeated requests from the Guardian and BBC
Television.

Bush’s attempt to appoint Hit-woman Harriet to the US Supreme Court in
2005 surprised many. Not me. Miers, personal and governmental lawyer for
George Bush, had quite a file on her boss, and he must have been grateful
for her discretion.

Most crucially, she knew why Bush so desperately needed to give GTech the
lottery contract. The heart of the matter was the then-successful cover-up
of the Bush family’s using its influence to get young George Bush into the
Texas Air National Guard and out of the Vietnam war draft.

The memo to the US Attorney reads:

“Governor Bush thru [name withheld] made a deal with Ben Barnes not to
rebid because Barnes could confirm that Bush had lied during the ‘94
campaign [for governor of Texas]. Bush was asked if his father … had
helped him get in the National Guard. Bush said no he had not, but the
fact is his dad call then-Lt. Gov. [Ben] Barnes ….”

Lt. Governor Barnes, through a cut-out, called the Texas Air Guard
commander and got Bush into the ‘top gun’ seat and out of the war.

You may recall that in 2004, years after we reported this story in
Britain, Barnes confessed to the draft-dodge fix on 60 Minutes. [That was
the report that brought down Dan Rather; but the Barnes confession was
never challenged.]

What 60 Minutes missed is the creepy Miers involvement. Barnes, after he
left the post of Lt. Governor, became a lobbyist — for GTech, the lottery
company. By using his influence to get and keep the lottery contract for
GTech, Barnes picked up quite a nice fee: over $23 million. With those
millions in his pocket, Barnes kept a happy and lucrative silence about
his saving little George Bush from the draft.

According to the memo from the US Attorney’s office, Barnes met with Bush
about GTech and the lottery. Then,

“The Governor talked to the chair of the lottery [Miers] two days later
and she then agreed to support letting GTech keep the contract without a
bid.”

Note something else here: this information was sitting in the hands of the
US Attorney. Yet, no action was taken in 1997 though we now know that,
from Barnes’ confession in 2004, the accusation about his putting in the
fix for young George Bush is true.

An insider told BBC TV that the US Attorney’s office and Justice
Department, though under Democratic control, never acted because they
discovered that Barnes, a Democrat, had not only manipulated the system to
get George Bush into the Texas Air Guard, Barnes did the same for the sons
of Democratic big wigs including Congressman (later Senator) Lloyd Bentsen
and Governor John Connolly.

In other words, control over a US Attorney and what is called their
“prosecutorial discretion” is worth its weight in gold to politicians.
They can provide protection for cronies and exact punishment on enemies.
And no one knows that better than “Justice” Harriet Miers and her boss,
fighter pilot George W. Bush.

***********************

This report is adapted from Greg Palast’s New York Times bestselling book,
ARMED MADHOUSE: From Baghdad to New Orleans — Sordid Secrets and Strange
Tales of a White House Gone Wild. New edition to be released April 24.

Palast live in Chicago, Madison, Portland, Eugene, San Francisco, San
Jose, Los Angeles, Santa Fe, New York, Washington and Vermont beginning
April 21. Check the Calendar at http://www.GregPalast.com

For more information on Miers and clips of the BBC Television reports, go
to http://www.GregPalast.com
_____________________________

Note: This message comes from the peace-justice-news e-mail mailing list of 
articles and commentaries about peace and social justice issues, activism, etc. 
 If you do not regularly receive mailings from this list or have received this 
message as a forward from someone else and would like to be added to the list, 
send a blank e-mail with the subject "subscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] or you 
can visit:
http://lists.enabled.com/mailman/listinfo/peace-justice-news  Go to that same 
web address to view the list's archives or to unsubscribe.

E-mail accounts that become full, inactive or out of order for more than a few 
days will become disabled or deleted from this list.

FAIR USE NOTICE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the 
information in this e-mail is distributed without profit to those who have 
expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational 
purposes.  I am making such material available in an effort to advance 
understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, 
scientific, and social justice issues, etc. I believe this constitutes a 'fair 
use' of copyrighted material as provided for in the US Copyright Law.

Reply via email to