Thank you. I think you should switch to GPL 3, it's recommended by the folks who wrote GPL to switch as soon as possible.
Martin Geisler wrote: >Dmitri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >Hi Dmitri > > > >>I have a question about the licencing of PEL >> >>I am not an expert in licences but I think that old GPL licence is not >>compatable with GPL v3 >> >> > >I'm no expert either, but I found this page on the FSF: > > http://www.fsf.org/licensing/licenses/quick-guide-gplv3.html > >They explain that you can go from GPL v2 to v3 when the program has the >"either version 2 of the License, or (at your option) any later version" >phrase in the license. And PEL has that piece of text in every file, so >you are free to upgrade to GPL3! > > > >>My project is licenced under GPL v3. This probably means that I cannot >>include a PEL class in my project. >> >>Do you think you can release the copy of PEL also under GPL version 3? >> >> > >I would definitely like to switch to GPL3. I guess there should be >nothing stopping us from doing so... Does anybody have any objection to >such a license change? > > > -- Open Source ALL content management with streaming video http://wiki.sharedlog.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace _______________________________________________ PEL-devel mailing list PEL-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pel-devel
