COCKROACH! EXTRA..(NEW ZEALAND !)

A EZINE FOR POOR AND WORKING CLASS PEOPLE.

WE HAVE NOTHING TO LOSE BUT OUR CHAINS.

It is time that the poor and working class people
have a voice on the Internet.

Contributions can be sent to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subscribtions are free at    <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Now online at http://www.kmf.org/malecki/

How often this zine will appear depends on you!
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Letter to Cockroach from New Zealand.

2.  Bureaucracy, Workers, the Bourgeoisie and Breaking the Chains.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------

Kia Ora Ano
Greetings Again

Personal Background

I write from Wellington, New Zealand.   I have been very active in
the Unemployed and Beneficiaries Movement, at a local level and
national level. 

That work (all voluntary, as I too are on a benefit) has brought
me into contact with hundreds/thousands of fellow beneficiaries,
all with their degree of knowledge of the struggle.   They have
been solo-mothers at state-funded/privately-run Training
Programmes, street people (some being alcoholics, glue-sniffers,
with ages ranging from mid-teens to 70s), members of Gangs, new
migrants, those with learning problems.

The work has included writing a manual about benefit assistance,
making Community Radio programmes on issues affecting unpaid
workers, writing submissions about various law changes our
Government try to impose on us, one-to-ne advocacy, organising
campaigns of various kinds, research of various subjects, and
visiting schools/Training programmes for beneficiaries to
talk/listen on issues to, do with Income Support and the history
of unemployment in NZ.

I am certainly socialist - but also see some of the activities
which the state imposes on people need to be challenged there and
then, and where possible the states legal abuse of working people
stopped/minimised.   Hence I have been accused of being a
"reformist" by some on the left.

I started this article after reading Cockroach 33

=====================================

Bureauracy, Workers, the Bourgeoisie and Breaking the Chains

It seems that society and organisations have created bureaucracy for
many years  - at least in the last century.   These bureaucracies are
a set of people, a class or caste, that have power, and use that
power to thrawt genuine progress that will free all people from the
oppression that defiles both oppressed and oppressor.

These bureaucracies take the form of business managers, management
of government agencies, trade unions and very often community
based groups. 

While the ownership of business is spread quite thinly among
shareholders, the large multi-nationals are the realm of large
corporate owners and the managers.   The multi-nationals are
becoming more and more dominant in terms share of world turnover.
So while capitalism itself is a problem, the concept of the
indivdual working, using their own tools, their hands and minds is
not.  Capitalism corrupts the sharing of the fruits of labour and
leisure.   Bureaucrats in the private sector are powerful peices
in this process of corruption.

Government agencies, whether the Police, Welfare Department
officials or whatever often follow an unwritten ethos which defies
the spirit if not the letter of the laws they are there to
administer.. In NZ our Welfare agency (Income Support) is continuing
on a move to tightly targeted systems rather than universal
provision in an capitalist system showing increasing signs of
collapse - yet somehow never collapsing.

While many trade unionists - perhaps the vast majority of those
who are members, delegates and officials - have a true vocation in
the fight for worker rights, they as an organisation often respond
to weakly, or too slowly.    In NZ we had a classic example in 1991
when the newly elected National (Conservative) introduced
legislation which would make collective wage bargining much hardly,
AND legislation which would cut benefits by over 30% in some cases
and introduce savage "stand down" provisions where unless the
beneficiary met extra conditions they would not be eligible for
state support for six months.   Our trade union movement - or at
least its leadership - some avowed members of the Moscow aligned
Soiclaist Unity Party - failed to respond t calls for action from
their own members and from community groups including the
unemployed workers movement.    Support for the fight against
these two peices of legislation was token.    Dispite massive
public support there was little industrial action and the
legislation was passed.

Many groups not fitting the description, private sector, government
agancy or trade union have equally created bureaucracies which
defeat the purposes for which the organisations were set up.

Bureaucracts have let the people down. Public servents feel the
need to serve Ministers of State. Trade Unionists hide behind the
rules set up by the members to stiffle ground-swell fights. 

It is also my belief, that while members of left parties do indeed
have plans/programs, they run the risk, if not have fallen into
the trap already of becoming bureaucrats themselves.

Left groups seem more interested in theoritical debates of which
program is most pure.   Meanwhile the attacks by the state and the
business class continue to grow.

The attacks on workers (those receiving wages and those denied and
living on benefits) have been increasing in NZ at least since 1975.
(My personal/life exerience of these attacks - obviously the
attacks have been going through-out history).   While some of the
left parties have been involved in the groups formed to fight
these attacks, their involvement has been in part to form a United
Front, and once formed, to lead it.    This seems to me arrognace.

Freire talks of the need for those from the oppressor class to
become one with the oppressed.   To recognise the structures, and
fight for the end of oppression - not merely the replacement of
one oppressor with another - which what the USSR became.

Simone Weil became concerned about the arrogance of the freedom
fighters in the Spansih Civil War.  An arrogance and lack of care
or consideration of the peasants they were supposedly fighting
with.

My experience of the oppressed in New Zealand is that they are
very aware of the causes of their oppression.    Whether these
people be university drop-outs or those from the glue-sniffing
community who have lived on the streets since before their teens.

They also recognise those from the oppressor class who try and
claim to be the leaders in any so-called class struggle. 

It seems to me until these leaders drop such titles and actually
become one with the oppressed, rather than just an intelligent person
with good intentions, rather than displaying unconscious
arrogance then the struggle will not become anything mere than
rhetoric in a world becoming increasingly oppressive. 

The struggle is not after all to replace one set of leaders with
another -  it is too free us from oppression.   While the us is
often called "worker class" many by some twist of statistics we
arrive at 75-80% of the population, many of the oppressors are
workers (called Bourgeoisie in the parlance) and these oppressor
have no intention of changing the system.  While in many senses
workers are 75-80%+ of the worlds population this belies the
nature of the oppressor state (whether capitalist or USSR type).  
In the community/society I work in (New Zealand), the oppressed
make up about 25% of the population.   Many of the workers making
up the balance of the 75-80%+ "workers" are far to scared to fight
the oppressor state because short term it will cost them. 

The left are doing very little to ( in NZ  anyway) become one with
the these oppressed, although many are beneficiaries (welfare
recipients) 

It is my belief that many in the vanguard have in fact become the
bourgeoisie despite their ability to quote program, to use the
rhetoric. 

So, how to break the chains.

It certainly requires those wanting to do the breaking to
understand the structures and concepts which cause oppression.  

It certainly requires an understanding that the goal is not to
replace one form of oppression with another.   

But it also means working as one of the oppressed, in always ensuring
actions are designed to reduce oppression and the effects of
oppression.

It means fighting on every issue, individually and collectively
for the greater goal - that of ridding the world from oppression.

It means acknowledging the fact, that while the revolutionaries of
October 1917 may have had good intentions, by the end of a few
short years these ideals had been all but forgotten, and it was
the party, power (the other side of the coin called oppression)
that became all dominant.

Graham H.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------
Check Out My HomePage where you can,

Read the book! Ha Ha Ha McNamara,
Vietnam-My Bellybutton is my Crystalball!

Or Get The Latest Issue of,

COCKROACH, a zine for poor and workingclass people

HTTP://WWW.ALGONET.SE/~MALECKI

If The links are not working you can write to me 
from my home page and get the latest issue of COCKROACH!
--------------------------------------------------------









Reply via email to