Jim Devine wrote, >The laws of quantum mechanics imply that Hayek couldn't have been wrong >_all the time_. But I think it's bad karma to bring up Hayek on pen-l, >because there are Hayekian lurkers about who will bombard us with the Truth >about Hayek. Now hold on just a moment! Am I the only one in the world who thinks that Hayekianism *rigourously applied* would produce a devastating critique of the Thatcherite masquerade? Of course, no self-respecting Hayekian (least of all Hayek, himself) would *dream* of rigourously applying the critique to themselves and no one else would really *need* Hayek to unmask the transparently self-serving inconsistencies of 'neo-liberalism'. Oh well. Regards, Tom Walker ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ knoW Ware Communications | Vancouver, B.C., CANADA | "Only in mediocre art [EMAIL PROTECTED] | does life unfold as fate." (604) 669-3286 | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ The TimeWork Web: http://mindlink.net/knowware/worksite.htm