Was Lacan responsible for the semantic reversal of "overdetermination"? 
Freud seems to have appropriated this concept from algebra: if you have
more equations than unknowns (linear systems) either the system is
inconsistent or redundant.  In the latter case the extra equations give
you the same information as the other ones do, and the system is called
overdetermined.  Freud used this in his dream interpretation (which I
have already villified).  He thought symbols revealed the hidden meaning
of dreams.  If your dream has five symbols and they all mean the same
thing, that's what your dream means and it is overdetermined.  Not great
psychology, but at least it is metaphorically correct with respect to
math.

Somewhere along the line (in France I think), the idea took hold that
the world might be pictured as a mathematical system, except that the
number of unknows exceeds the number of equations.  Thus the outcome is
indeterminate.  And this situation was dubbed "overdetermination",
reversing the original Freudian use and making hash of the math
reference.  (Veterans of the UMass econ department know this ever so
well.)  So whodunnit?  Was it Lacan?

Peter Dorman



Reply via email to