While cluster bombs are not specifically banned under
international conventions, landmines are. However the US together
with Turkey refuse to sign on to the convention. However, the
indicscriminate use of weapons is forbidden as well as the use of
indiscriminate weapons.
The failure rate of the bomblets in cluster bombs is roughly 5
(conservatively) to 30 percent.
When the bomblet fails it is in effect a landmine and an
indiscriminte weapon Several Albanian children have already been
blown up. For some reason the bomblets are brightly coloured and
about the size and shape of soda cans in one instance and
baseballs in a different type. This makes them attractive to
children.
The bombs are relatively cheap because no safety devices that
would automatically defuse duds are
engineered into the bombs.
    Cheers, Ken Hanly
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<title>NATO's Use of Cluster Munitions in Yugoslavia</title>
<META NAME="KeyWords" CONTENT="human rights, violations, cluster bombs, arms, NATO, 
Kosovo, Operation Allied Forces, civil liberties, HUMAN RIGHTS, Press, Release, 1999, 
may">
<META NAME="Description" CONTENT="      ">
</head>
<Body TEXT="#000000" LINK="#0000ff" VLINK="#551a8b" ALINK="#ff0000" >
<!-- Table ONE : Top Nevigation..Don't Change it Daily-->
<table width=600 cellspacing="2" cellpadding="2" border="0">
<tr>
<td width="200" align="LEFT" valign="center" bgcolor="Silver">
<font size="-2"> <b>HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH</b>
</td></FONT>
<td width="400" align="RIGHT" valign="center" bgcolor="Silver"><font size="-2">
<a href="http://www.hrw.org">HOME </a>|<a href="http://www.hrw.org/site-map.html"> 
SITEMAP</a> | <a href="http://www.hrw.org/search.html">SEARCH</a> | <a 
href="http://www.hrw.org/about/about.html">CONTACT</a> | <a 
href="http://www.hrw.org/research/nations.html">REPORTS</a> |<a 
href="http://www.hrw.org/press/1999/index.htm"> PRESS ARCHIVES</a></font></td>    
</tr>
</table>
<!-- End of Table ONE -->
<!-- Table Two :Link to World Report Entry and Add GIF file for Language if required. 
Needs Updating all the Time. GIF file requires to have HTML Link to Actual Press 
Release in language -->

<table width=600 cellspacing="2" cellpadding="2" border="0">
<tr>
<td width="300" align="LEFT" valign="center" bgcolor="Silver">
<a href=http://www.hrw.org/hrw/worldreport99/arms/index.html>Arms -- 1999 World Report 
Chapter</a></td>
<td width="300" align="RIGHT" bgcolor="Silver">
<FONT COLOR="#FF0000" SIZE=+1>FREE</FONT>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
<A HREF="http://www.hrw.org/act/subscribe-mlists/subscribe.htm">Join the
HRW Mailing List</A>&nbsp;</a> 
</td>    
</tr>
</table>

<!-- End of Table TWO -->
<!-- Table THREE : Headings and Sub-Heading -->
<table width=600 cellspacing="2" cellpadding="2" border="0">
<tr>
<td>
<!-- First Heading Font Size +1 -->
<CENTER><font size="+1"><b>
NATO's Use of Cluster Munitions in Yugoslavia</b></font><br>
<!-- Sub Heading Goes Here Size +.5 Size. Can be Deleted if NOT used -->
<I><font size="+.5">
</font></I></CENTER>
</table>
<!-- End of Table THREE -->
<table width=600 cellspacing="2" cellpadding="2" border="0">
<tr>
<td>(May 11, 1999) -- The U.S. Defense Department at the end of April announced a move 
toward the use of more "area weapons" in Operation Allied Force.  At the same time, 
there are reports of NATO's growing shortage of precision-guided weapons.  These 
factors suggest NATO may increasingly rely on unguided ("dumb") weapons, including 
so-called cluster bombs.
<!-- Table for Related Material (Start) -->     
<table width=200 align=right border=0 cellpadding=0 cellspacing=0>
<td width=10>
</td>
<td valign=top width=120>
<hr size=1>
<font size=-1>
<b><font color="Red">Related Material </font></b><br>
<BR>

<a href="http://www.hrw.org/press/1999/may/arms51199.htm"> NATO Use of Cluster Bombs 
Must Stop </a><br>HRW Press Release, May 11, 1999 <BR><BR>



<a href="http://www.hrw.org/hrw/campaigns/kosovo98/index.htm"> Kosovo: Focus on Human 
Rights</a><BR>

<BR>



<hr size=1></font>
</table>
<!-- Table for Related Material (End) -->       

<!-- Body Text Continues...Part II -->
<p>
Both the U.S. and Britain have acknowledged using cluster bombs in Yugoslavia already. 
 U.S. F-15E and F-16 aircraft have dropped CBU-87 cluster bombs, and British Harrier 
GR7s began dropping RBL755 cluster bombs on April 6.  The CBU-87 and RBL755 weapons 
have been used against airfields, communications and early-warning sites, vehicle 
concentrations on roads, Yugoslav Army command posts, troop compounds and 
concentrations, artillery, and armor units.  There have been reports of cluster bombs 
being used at Batanica airbase near Belgrade and Podgorica airfield in Montenegro, as 
well as in the following areas in Kosovo: an "agricultural school" on the outskirts of 
Pristina, near Belacevac, Djakovica, Doganovic, Lukare, Mt. Cicavica (northwest of 
Pristina), Mt. Pastrik (near Prizren), and Stari Trg (near Kosovska Mitrovica).<P>


Though probably no more than a few hundred air-delivered cluster bombs have been used 
to date in Yugoslavia, there reportedly already have been civilian casualties.  A NATO 
airstrike on the airfield in Nis last week went off target, hitting a hospital complex 
and adjoining civilian areas.  In an earlier incident on April 24, five boys were 
reported to have been killed and two injured when what was evidently a cluster bomb 
submunition exploded near the village of Doganovic, fifteen kilometers from Urosevac 
in southern Kosovo.  The munition was described as having a yellow-colored jacket, 
identical to that of the CBU-87 or RBL755 bomblets.<P>


The U.S. Army is deploying 155mm artillery guns and Multiple-Launch Rocket System 
(MLRS) launchers as part of Task Force Hawk in Albania.  Both of these systems are 
capable of dispensing submunitions—the ATACMS missile fired from the MLRS launcher 
dispenses as many as 955 bomblets.  There has also been speculation that the CBU-89 
Gator scatterable mine is available for use, and the U.S. government has stated that 
it reserves the right to use this weapon should the need arise.<P>


The CBU-89 Gator has been banned under the 1997 Mine Ban Treaty, which came into force 
in March 1999.  The United States has not signed the treaty, but all other NATO 
members, except Turkey, have.  Human Rights Watch calls on the United States not to 
use the CBU-89 Gator scatterable mine system, because this is an inherently 
indiscriminate weapon.  <P>


Human Rights Watch condemns NATO's use of cluster bombs in Yugoslavia, given the 
proven high dud rate of the submunitions employed.  These weapons are indiscriminate 
in effect—the equivalent of using antipersonnel landmines.  Human Rights Watch is also 
concerned that cluster bombs may be used in attacks on urban centers.  This would 
present a particularly hazardous condition for the civilian population and should 
therefore be avoided.<P>


 Recognizing the danger to civilians inherent in the use of cluster bombs, air combat 
commander Maj. Gen. Michael Ryan (now U.S. Air Force chief of staff) decided during 
Operation Deliberate Force in Bosnia in 1995 to prohibit their use.  "The problem was 
that the fragmentation pattern was too large to sufficiently limit collateral damage 
and there was also the further problem of potential unexploded ordnance," says one Air 
Force-sponsored study.<P>


<B>High Dud Rate</B><P>


The CBU-87 and RBL755 are both mixed antipersonnel/antiarmor weapons that dispense 
explosive and incendiary submunitions fused to explode on contact.  With 202 
individual bomblets, the CBU-87 disperses its submunitions over an area at least the 
size of a football field.  The RBL755 dispenses 147 bomblets.  Most cluster bombs are 
intended for "soft" targets, that is, troops or unarmored vehicles, as well as fixed 
targets of a dispersed yet unprotected nature, such as communications sites.<P>


The weapons are kept relatively inexpensive (in comparison with guided weapons) 
through the economical use of fuses and materials.  The side-effect of keeping the 
expense of individual bomblets low is a significant dud rate.  Estimates of overall 
dud rates vary from the conservative 2-5 percent claimed by manufacturers, to up to 23 
percent observed in acceptance and operational testing, to some 10-30 percent observed 
on the ground in areas of Iraq after the Gulf War.  Human Rights Watch has used a 
conservative estimate of 5 percent mechanical and fuse failures to estimate the 
humanitarian effect.  This number seems credible to most experts.<P>


Thus for Operation Allied Force, the historical record and testing experience would 
tend to indicate that for every single CBU-87 used, there will be an average of some 
ten unexploded bomblets, and for every RBL755, there will be an average of five 
unexploded bomblets.   Bombing in Operation Allied Force to date has been almost 
exclusively from medium altitudes (circa 15,000 feet), raising important questions 
regarding the ability to control the collateral damage effects of the use of cluster 
bombs, and the number of dispersed unexploded bomblets.  It is also important to note 
that the experience of cluster bomb use in the Gulf War and other conflicts indicates 
that the failure to fuse properly does not mean that submunitions on the ground are 
harmless.  Cluster bomb submunitions, however fused, may explode at the slightest 
touch, even after extended periods of time.<P>


<B>Widespread Cluster Bomb Use in the Gulf War</B><P>


The 1991 Gulf war saw the most extensive and widespread use of cluster bombs in the 
history of armed conflict, both air- and ground-delivered.  Given the flexibility in 
delivery modes for the newer bombs, particularly the capacity for delivery at 
extremely high speeds, and the reliability in comparison with Vietnam-era cluster 
bombs, CBU-87s became, according to the U.S. Air Force, the "weapon of choice."  About 
one quarter of the total number of weapons dropped by aircraft on Iraq and Kuwait were 
cluster bombs, a total of 62,000 air-delivered cluster bombs.  In addition, some 
100,000 Dual-Purpose Improved Conventional Munition (DPICM) artillery shells and 
10,000 MLRS rockets were expended (see Table 2).  This translates, overall, into the 
dispersal of somewhere on the order of 24-30 million submunitions.  Assuming a dud 
rate of 5 percent, the number of individual live submunitions left on the battlefield, 
and in other areas of Iraq and Kuwait, can be reasonably estimated to be, at a 
minimum, 1.2 to 1.5 million.<P>


Cluster bombs were used in attacks demanding dispersed yet fairly accurate damage 
against fixed "soft" targets (for example, radar, surface-to-air missile, and 
communications installations).  Bombing from medium or high altitudes had a 
significant impact on both cluster bomb accuracy and reliability.  Not only was there 
a greater dispersal pattern for the submunitions than was intended with low-altitude 
delivery, but pilots were outside the range needed to make sighting corrections or 
assess damage.  Vietnam-era CBU-52/58/71 cluster bombs, intended originally solely for 
low-altitude delivery, also "performed poorly throughout the war," according to the 
Gulf War Air Power Survey.<P>


One of the unexpected problems involved in medium- and high-altitude delivery of 
cluster bombs in Operation Desert Storm, even with the newer CBU-87s, was that the 
weapons began to experience what has been termed "excessively high dud rates."  
Despite contact fuses and secondary firing systems, an enormous number of submunitions 
failed to detonate, particularly when landing in soft sand, shallow water, or mud.<P>
 

One of the most immediate problems raised by the large number of unexploded bomblets 
that was being observed on the ground was the threat to U.S. and coalition forces in 
ground operations.  The situation became so critical that the use of cluster bombs by 
aircraft was cut back by U.S. Central Command during the ground war for fear of 
friendly casualties.   As the ground war began, in some instances, "ground movement 
came to a halt because units were afraid of encountering unexploded ordnance."  Troops 
with the U.S. 1st Armored Division said that the principal threat they faced was 
"unexploded ordnance believed to have been left over from an earlier American 
bombardment."  The Washington Post observed on March 3 that "units of the army's 1st 
Cavalry Division that had suffered no combat casualties in their unopposed drive 
through southern Iraq have seen several of their soldiers killed or wounded by bombs 
or mines in the area they are holding."<P>
 

Post-war injuries to U.S. and U.K. soldiers from submunitions on the battlefield, 
mostly because of excessively high dud rates of one type of grenades in the 155mm 
artillery projectile and MLRS rockets, subsequently received much press attention in 
the United States and Britain, as well as U.S. Congressional interest.  The General 
Accounting Office (GAO) concluded that during Operation Desert Storm at least 
twenty-five U.S. military personnel were killed and others were injured by 
submunitions fired by their own forces.  Unexploded submunitions also caused many 
casualties among disposal specialists.<P>


<B>Dangers to the Civilian Population</B><P>


The use of cluster bombs in Kuwait, on and around roads in southern, northern, and 
western Iraq, as well as in urban areas in Iraq led to a particularly hazardous 
situation for the noncombatant civilian populations of both Iraq and Kuwait.  In the 
Iraqi town of Safwan, for example, as the refugee population swelled after the 
cease-fire, "the number of injuries caused by unexploded ordnance rose alarmingly."  
There were widespread and consistent reports of Iraqi and Kuwaiti civilians being 
killed or injured by unexploded bomblets from coalition cluster bombs.  Unexploded 
submunitions were a hazard to Kurdish refugees and foreign relief operations in the 
north.<P>


The widespread and indiscriminate use of cluster bombs in civilian areas thus 
generally impeded post-war recovery for the civilian population.  Iraqi authorities 
claim to have cleared over one-half million items of unexploded ordnance in urban 
areas of the country, and removed tens of thousands of unexploded submunitions from 
electrical power plants and telephone, television, and radio communications 
installations, from the approaches to bridges, and from civilian neighborhoods.  Even 
if the Iraqi authorities and the experiences of other observers in Iraq were not to be 
believed, one of the first tasks of the Allied forces in extinguishing the oil fires 
in Kuwait after the war was clearing unexploded ordnance, particularly coalition 
submunitions.  The Kuwaiti minister for electricity and water stated that delays in 
restoring services were caused by the discovery of "unexploded cluster bombs and 
minefields at crucial spots in the electric grid."<P>


Cluster bomb submunitions that failed to detonate were also responsible for a 
considerable portion of the immediate post-war civilian injuries in Iraq.  It is 
estimated that more than 1,600 civilians (400 Iraqi and 1,200 Kuwaiti) were killed and 
over 2,500 injured in the first two years after the end of the Gulf war from accidents 
involving submunitions.<P>


A particular problem for the civilian population, particularly children, was the very 
design of the submunitions.  "Toy-size bombs designed to kill tanks and soldiers 
[also] appear as white lawn darts, green baseballs, orange-striped soda cans," one 
report from Kuwait reported almost a year after the war ended.  These attractively 
arrayed and intriguing unexploded submunitions "proved deadly to children."  Kuwaiti 
doctors stated that some 60 percent of the victims of unexploded ordnance injuries 
were children aged fifteen and under.<P>


The "lawn darts" referred to are Vietnam-era Rockeye submunitions that were used in 
huge numbers in 1991.  The baseball-like remnants are from older CBU-52/58/71 cluster 
bombs and the ground artillery- and rocket-delivered bomblets.  The orange-striped 
"soda cans" are the distinct remnants of the BLU-97 bomblets from the CBU-87 and the 
British BL755.<P>


 <P>


<BR>

</td>
</tr>
<!-- Table (part of Table THREE Row for Further Contact Information Details -->
<tr>
    <td><B>For Further Information:</B><P>
        
Joost Hiltermann  (316) 2293-6742 (in the Netherlands)<BR>
Bill Arkin (802) 457-3426 (home) or (201) 583-5151 (at MSNBC in New Jersey) <BR>

Carroll Bogert (212) 216-1244 (in New York)<BR><BR>


        </td>
</tr>
</table>

<!-- Table  for Bottom Nevigation. Don't Change it Daily-->
<table width=600 cellspacing="2" cellpadding="2" border="0">
<tr>
<td width="200" align="LEFT" valign="center" bgcolor="Silver">
<font size="-2"> <b>HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH</b>
</td></FONT>
<td width="400" align="RIGHT" valign="center" bgcolor="Silver"><font size="-2">
<a href="http://www.hrw.org">HOME </a>|<a href="http://www.hrw.org/site-map.html"> 
SITEMAP</a> | <a href="http://www.hrw.org/search.html">SEARCH</a> | <a 
href="http://www.hrw.org/about/about.html">CONTACT</a> | <a 
href="http://www.hrw.org/research/nations.html">REPORTS</a> |<a 
href="http://www.hrw.org/press/1999/index.htm"> PRESS ARCHIVES</a></font></td>    
</tr>
</table>
</body>
</html>

Reply via email to