-----Original Message-----
From: Dennis R Redmond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-Yes, but your list from the Economist includes only one First World
-country

What makes the global collapse so dangerous is that is comes on top of the
persistent unemployment in much of the First World.  The Euro-11 countries
have official unemployment of 10.8% and Japan has seen increases in
official unemployment (which underreports real unemployment as many women
have been driven from the labor market altogether).

The United States has become this bizarre anamoly, partly explained by the
labor "flexibility" (meaning creation of unregulated bad jobs) but needing
broader explanations as well.  Part is obviously the US's role as the
center of the current computer revolution related to networking and part
may be driven by the hyperprofits of global capitalism inducing "wealth
effects" spending here.

--Nathan Newman






Reply via email to