Re: Re: Re: recent economic trends

[Michael Perelman]

That was my reading of Smith.

Jim Devine wrote:

> Michael Perelman wrote:
> >The actual conspiracy that I was accused suggesting was that Adam Smith
> >wrote in such a way as to intentionally mislead his readers.  In that
> >case, the conspiracy consisted of Adams Smith alone.  So he must have
> >engaged in a "spiracy," since there were no cons involved in the plot.
>
> any pros?
>
> anyway, isn't it possible that Smith simply misled himself (via ideology)
> and thus misled others?
>
>

--

Michael Perelman
Economics Department
California State University
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Chico, CA 95929
530-898-5321
fax 530-898-5901