Supposdly, the Dutch boom caused resources to be drawn away from the
manufacturing sector, making it less competitive.  Some have drawn
parallels with the influx of gold to Spain from L. America.

On Sun, Feb 24, 2002 at 08:40:53PM -0800, Eugene Coyle wrote:
> Why wouldn't the cheaper natural resource, as an input to the productive
> process, lower the cost of manufactured goods and make them MORE
> competitive with other nations?
> 
>     Further, the cheaper natural resource, to the extent it is a consumer
> commodity as well, e. g. home heating, reduces the cost of living doesn't
> it?  And then the additional real income can be spent on domestic
> products, adding to employment and creating a general boom.
> 
>     As I write this I wonder if the assumption of the country being
> already at full employment isn't crucial to the onset of the disease.
> That assumption distorts everything -- and as old as I am I have never
> seen or read of actual full employment.
> 
> Gene Coyle
> 
> Bill Lear wrote:
> 
> > According to investorwords.com, "dutch disease" is:
> >
> >      The  deindustrialization of a  nation's economy  that occurs
> >      when the discovery of a natural resource raises the value of
> >      that  nation's  currency,  making  manufactured  goods  less
> >      competitive  with  other  nations,  increasing  imports  and
> >      decreasing  exports.  The term  originated in  Holland after
> >      the discovery of North Sea gas.
> >
> > A nephew of mine who is majoring in economics here in Austin asked me
> > about this, and I was entirely ignorant of it, but it from what he
> > told me, it sounded suspicious.  The definition here makes the claim
> > that when the value of a nation's currency increases,
> > deindustrialization occurs.  It also claims that discovery of a
> > natural resource can lead to a rise in a nation's currency.
> > Simplistic formula like this are often used to mask the operations of
> > nefarious power, so I'm curious if this is a valid concept, etc.
> >
> > If a natural resource were discovered, why would it necessarily result
> > in a rise in value of the currency?  If Nigeria discovers lots of oil,
> > why could it not use the proceeds from the sale to *increase*
> > industrialization?  Policy decisions seem to me to be operative here,
> > but I need some help figuring this out...
> >
> > Bill
> 

-- 
Michael Perelman
Economics Department
California State University
Chico, CA 95929

Tel. 530-898-5321
E-Mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to