Deng Xiao Ping Theory: The Framework which Guides China's Development
by Eric Sommer

In the movement of new knowledge and innovations across the globe,, some things 
travel quickly. But other things, especially those which encounter cultural or 
ideological barriers, may move with glacial slowness or not at all. The whole 
world knows that China is the fastest expanding economy in the world, with 
average 10% or more growth per year, and a potential economic and political 
super-power. But the framework which guides China's remarkable development 
remains almost unknown outside the country.
  What makes outside ignorance particularly odd is that the theory is known to 
almost everybody inside China, for it is a key part of the curriculm in public 
school, and is a required subject for many university programs. It is also the 
offical policy of the Chinese Government and the Chinese Communist Party, and 
it is currently a key part of the education of the 60 million or so members of 
the communist party in China.
  Chinese people call this framework - which guides China's development - 'Deng 
Xiao Ping Theory'. And it was, to a great extent, created by China's late 
president Deng Xiao Ping. To fully understand Dengs' contribution, we need to 
see it within the historical context from which it emerged.

  After Mao Tse Tung's Death in 1976, Deng re-emerged as a national leader, and 
moved the party to break the 'cult of personality' around Mao which had deified 
him as a human God who could make no mistakes. Deng declared that the Chinese 
people need *not* always follow 'the way indicated by Chairman Mao'. Instead, 
he insisted that 'everyone can think for themselves' about China and its 
development. Moreover, under Dengs' leadership the party made a serious 
critique of Mao's role.

Critique of Mao

  This critique found that in the first part of his life Mao's contribution to 
China was mostly good: This contribution was, first, Mao's leadership role in 
the revolution" with its anti-feudal aim to free peasant farmers from the 
terrible exploitation and oppression they suffered under feudal landlords; 
second, Mao's special method of popular 'people's war' using guerrilla warfare 
based on the peasantry, the elimination of the control of different parts of 
the country by separate warlods; and the elimination of foreign domination. Mao 
also made a great contribution in providing Communist leadership in the 
anti-Japanese war during the Japanese invasion and occupation of large parts of 
China.

  In the second part of his life, however, the party found that Mao made very 
serious mistakes - mistakes which had been harmful to China's people and to 
their economy.. These mistakes included the great leap forward and the cultural 
revolution. (Brief explanation of cultural revolution needed here.) The root 
cause of these mistakes, the party found, was Mao's wrongheaded, and 
economically and socially disastrous view that class struggle was the key to 
solving all problems, and his idea that class struggle must continue unabated 
in China even *after* its socialist revolution. (Brief explanation needed of 
the class-struggle-after-revolution concept.)

  Relevance to other Developing Countries

  Deng played a crucial role in getting the party, and the country, to accept 
the view that not class struggle but economic development was now central for 
solving China's problems, and that it, and not class struggle inside China, is 
the key to China's further development.
  In developing his theory, , Deng Xiao Ping persuaded the Communist party and 
government of China to adopt a completely new approach to Socialist and 
economic development in the post-Mao era:

Deng articulated three meta-economic criteria for evaluating all policies - 
policies and practices should !) maximize the productivity of China, 2) 
maximize the range of skills and abilities within China, and 3) maximize the 
standard of living of workers and peasents.

  The Market Belongs to Socialism

  To begin with, Deng reaffirmed long-term commitment to a cooperative 
socialist future for China. He said that, in fact, after a very long time the 
whole world will adopt advanced socialist or communist forms of cooperation and 
sharing. As a Marxist, he viewed even the collapse of the Soviet Union as a 
temporary setback. He believed that in an extended world-historical process 
humanity's' productive forces are gradually built up and, ultimately, will be 
socially shared resources for all people.

  Next, Deng declared that 'the market belongs to socialism as well as 
capitalism'. Deng proposed that In the period of socialist development - and 
especially for a developing country like China - private and public enterprises 
should function through the market. Deng called this view 'the socialist market 
economy'.

  Western world pundits, and especially those in the U.S., often equate the 
market with private ownership, while state planning is equated with socialism. 
One of Deng's key innovations was to say that under market socialism, state, 
cooperative, and private firms could *all* trade and function through the 
market. In China, the market does not mean only private enterprise. This is 
something which seems very hard for westerners, and perhaps especially 
American's, to understand. To those who think China is now simply a capitalist 
economy, it may come as a shock to learn that within China's mixed economy, 
China's state-owned enterprises had the most profitable year in their history 
in 2004; and that nearly half or so of all Chinese exports were from these 
firms.

  Deng's framework rests, in important part, on the Marxist notion that the 
build-up of social productive forces - skills, knowledge, tools, machines, 
social organization, and all else that contributes to human productions - 
leads, ultimately, to a cooperative socialist society.


  Openning up and Knowledge Transfer.

  A third pillar of Deng Xiao Ping's thinking was the theory of 'openning up'. 
Deng insisted that China needs to learn from the whole world. Deng rejected 
what western management theorists call the 'not-invented here fallacy'. This is 
the fallacy whereby some companies or organizations assume that anything they 
have not developed themselves cannot help them or is not valuable. Deng did not 
make this mistake. He clearly stated that China urgently needed injections of 
both knowledge and of capital from the outside world for its development.. Deng 
was deeply aware of China's need for scientific, technical, and managerial 
knowledge from the rest of the world, and especially from the 'advanced 
countries'. Joint ventures with foreign companies and organizations, and 
allowing foreign companies to operate in China under government guidelines, 
were seen as key means to access the needed knowledge and capital.

China's Economy Today.

  China's economy is frequently characterized, in western periodicals like the 
Economist, as dynamic but 'held back' by the presence of SOE's (state owned 
enterprises). Asian people often say that all things have a good side and a bad 
side. And this applies to the SOE's. Bad debts, some inefficiencies, corruption 
problems, and other problems (amplify this point) were the bad side for state 
owned banks and enterprises. However, many of these problems have been or are 
being resolved. Many unprofitable SOE's have been sold or closed.  In addition, 
however, at the macro-economic level, and in meeting social needs, and in 
generating revenues without imposing heavy taxes on the private sector, the 
combination of private and state owned sectors gives the government, and the 
country, enormous flexibility.
  Within the guidelines of Deng Xiao Ping Theory, China can utilize all 
economic forms to build productive forces and meet social needs.

  Enterprises can be owned and operated by large state companies associated 
with the central government, by city governments, by regional government 
economic organs, by workers cooperatives, and by private companies.

  Moreover, a mixture of these forms is frequently achieved through 
joint-venture enterprises owned jointly by state and by private parties.

  Deng Xao Ping famously summed-up this part of his approach with the aphorism: 
"It doesn't matter if the cat is black or white as long as it catches the 
mice." He meant that building up China's productive forces, and the standard of 
living of its people, is the priority, and that government, cooperative, or 
privately owned enterprises could all play a role in this process.
  The size of the social sector of the Chinese economy is sometimes 
underestimated due to government use of joint-stock economy forms. For example, 
government directives to SOE's to take on thousands of employees, and to take 
other special measures, were used to stabilize China's economy, and that of 
Asia and the world, during the severe Asian economic crisis during the late 
1990's. Though deeply relieved at the time, western, and especially U.S., 
ideological assumptions about the 'purity' of private enterprise have prevented 
proper credit from being given to the Chinese mixed economy for stabilizing 
Asia at a crucial moment.

  Latest Developments - Greening of China and Turn towards Greater Social 
Equality:
  To be added here: Explanation of the new 'scientific concept of development' 
as wholistic sustainable development, and explanation of the 'Construction of a 
New Socialist Countryside'.

  The Communist party and national People's congress of China recently held 
major meetings on the 11th five year plan for the country in Beijing. A new 
approach, based on upgrading social welfare, education, and medical services 
and medical insurance for all Chinese people, and also featuring protection of 
the environment and construction of a 'New Socialist Countryside' to radically 
upgrade the standard of living and life opportunities of farmers is being put 
in place.

  The concept of 'some can get rich first' which fueled the initial stages of 
the economic boom is being replaced with the goal of 'common prosperity for 
all' - and the notion that 'before the countryside supported the cities (in the 
initial stages of modernization and development) but now the 'cities must 
support the countryside (in providing the economic muscle to deliver medical 
care and health insurance, educational systems, increase crop yields, 
diversified economic base, and more to the 1 billion Chinese who inhabit the 
countryside). These new policies are, in a way, a reach backward to the 
socialist traditions of China but utilizing the market system - both public and 
private companies operating through the market - as the engine of development.

  There will now also be more emphasis on independent research, innovation, and 
science and technological development is also included. This is important and 
has been - as usual - inadequately reported in the western media. The 
government buzzword here is to turn China into an 'Innovation Society'.

  In addition, a completely revised set of GDP measurements, which will take 
environmental costs, and costs to workers health and well-being into account - 
is being prepared. This will vault China into a leading position, from its past 
poor record, on environment.

One Center; Two Points

  Deng Xiao Ping Theory is the official policy of the Chinese Communist party.  
It is elegantly summarized by the party itself as 'One Center; two points." The 
Center is Economic Development.  The Two points are Opening up and the 
Socialist Road  A third 'point' now being added, may be said to be the  
'greening of China', which now sports the world's first GDP to include 
substantial ecological criteria.

  China in recent decades has pioneered a new path of development,  Chinese 
authorities are quick to point out that no nation should blindly imitate 
China's economic and political approach;  each nation, they say,  must find its 
own path of development which is suited to its historical, social, and other 
conditions.

  Nevertheless, the tremendous progress achieved  by China, a nation of 1.3 
billion people,  under Deng Xiao Ping Theory is worthy of note by the rest of 
the world.  Moreover, while blind imitation is unwise, careful study and 
selective use of elements of this theory by other developing countries in 
Africa, Latin America, and Asia might well be of real benefit to the people of 
those  nations and the world


"True development puts first those that  society puts last."
-Mahatma Gandhi

"Dare to be naive."
- Buckminster Fuller

"Work for the world."
- Karl Marx

"A loving heart: In all the world this state of mind is best."
 - ADM CEO









---------------------------------
Never miss a thing.   Make Yahoo your homepage.

Reply via email to