https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1282911
--- Comment #8 from Petr Šabata <psab...@redhat.com> ---
(In reply to Denis Fateyev from comment #7)
> On the contrary, I'm planning to maintain it in EPEL too. Thanks for the
> detailed clarifications, anyway.
>
> - Added perl(integer) to BR (thought that all concerned Perl versions had it
> so omitted it initially);
You never know what the future might bring. And even if it's very unlikely,
just listing everything is more consistent and, in a way, easier.
> - Dropped META.json.
Ack.
> EL6 doesn't support %license tag so I didn't used it. The Group tag is also
> kept for more EPEL adaptivity.
Regarding the Group tag: Ack.
The %license macro is mandatory in Fedora, though.
I use the following `trick' in my packages. There might be a better way but
this works fine:
%{!?_licensedir:%global license %%doc}
%license LICENSE
%doc Changes README
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
