# from Andy Lester
# on Thursday 22 January 2009 11:31:
>> I personally use no_plan only because I can't be bothered to
>> manually count things and don't want to assume that the number of
>> tests run on *my* computer is somehow a universal constant.
>
>I'm glad you find no_plan useful. Many others do as well.
Perhaps I'm being unclear. I do not find either 'no_plan' or 'plan' to
be useful in their current state.
--Eric
--
If the collapse of the Berlin Wall had taught us anything, it was that
socialism alone was not a sustainable economic model.
--Robert Young
---------------------------------------------------
http://scratchcomputing.com
---------------------------------------------------
