Re: [ANNOUNCE] Test::More/Builder 0.89_01 now with subtests

[David E. Wheeler]

On Jun 23, 2009, at 2:22 PM, Paul Johnson wrote:

One question though.  Why

   subtest "text", sub {};

rather than

   subtest {}, "text";

?

The latter seems more consistent as well as removing a rather annoying bit of syntax. Were you worried that "text" might get lost at the end of the sub?

Even better, get rid of the two arguments:

    subtest {
        name 'text';
        pass;
    };

Best,

David