David,
> (3) either of the above but "use t::MyTest" rather than changing @INC
> with "use lib..."
>
> I don't think any one is much better than the others. I tend to like
> the "t::MyTest" approach from a readability standpoint because it's
> clear within the *.t file that this is a test library and it's clear
> where to locate it.
You know, that's one of the first solutions I thought of, but I was
afraid it was too much of a hack. But now that I know that other
folks do it that way, I'll go for it. :)
The only downside I see is that once I do that, those test files can't
be run from inside the t/ dir itself. But, now that I think about it,
that's probably true for other reasons as well (e.g. prove -l wouldn't
work from inside t/).
Okay, just some things I'm trying to work through as I (finally)
convert all my homegrown tests to standard TAPpy things and get some
stuff ready for CPAN. I'll probably have loads more questions later.
Thanx!
-- Buddy
