Hiya,
On 30 Oct 2011, at 19:23, Michael G Schwern wrote:
[snip]
>> * How would a no_plan subtest merge into a planned stream?
>
> Just fine, thanks. It would require no work at all. Without the TAP
> formatting, a no_plan subtest is equivalent to just running some tests.
What I was thinking of was this: with subtests folk who like having up-front
plans can do stuff like this:
use Test::More tests => 3;
pass("First test");
subtest 'An example subtest' => sub {
plan 'no_plan';
for (1..rand(10)+1 ) {
pass "indeterminate test run";
}
};
pass("Last test");
done_testing();
to isolate there unplannable stuff into subtests. Not possible with the
inlining.
Cheers,
Adrian
--
http://quietstars.com [email protected] twitter.com/adrianh
t. +44 (0)7752 419080 skype adrianjohnhoward del.icio.us/adrianh
