On Mon, Oct 22, 2001 at 02:14:43PM -0600, chromatic wrote: > On Monday 22 October 2001 14:13, Graham Barr wrote: > > > > I understood that as Graham being unsure about using Test::More in the > > > tests. > > > Actually I was refering to Mock::Socket > > Would you be amenable to a patch that moves that into the .t file?
That would be OK. Although if you intend other tests to use it I would place it into t/common.pl and require it in the test > There's no technical reason it has to be a module. I just wrote it that way, > thinking it might be expandable and reusable. That could be considered > jumping several guns. :) Sure, I was just suggesting that test could test for the existance of the module and skip otherwise Graham.
