>So you wouldn't be in favour of:

>    my Dog $spot;
>    print defined($spot) ? 'defined' : 'undefined'; # undefined
>    print $spot->isa('Dog') ? 'Dog' : 'not dog';    # Dog;

>then?

>Bang goes that RFC...

No, I would argue that undef() be changed to uninitialize().
This is infinitely better for many, many reasons.  

    1) Because it's now an action verb.  the English semantics of
       the word change will encourage the correct

            uninitialize @foo;

    2) For the same reason.  it will discourage the incorrect

            @foo = uninitialize;
       
    3) Likewise, it will discourage the incorrect

            if ($foo == uninitialize) 

    4) People won't be so quick to use it since it's longer to type

            uninitialize @foo;

       than the generally-fine and much more obvious

            @foo = ();

and best of all

    5) No lamer will ever whine "Why does it say uninitialized when I just
       now initialized it to uninitialized?" again.

You think of teasing.  And I am.  But if you think about it, this notion has 
a lot going for it, too.

--tom

Reply via email to