Fergal Daly writes: > didn't we have this debate before?
Yes. What's more at the start of this thread Ovid specifically said: There are all sorts of little details there, but basically, got/expected (or whatever names are settled on) are to be free-form text. The main question is whether or not those forms are HERE docs or follow a pseudo-YAML convention). That is, he accepts that the names aren't final but what he wants opinions on here is the format[*0], not the name. Please let's not repeat things said last time in the name debate; the archive is available for anybody who wishes to see what the various arguments are. [*0] Talking of which, I'm another vote on the no-here-docs side. Which is looking to be the unanimous preference of folks who've answered on this list -- obviously whichever of Schwern or Ovid came up with the here-doc syntax has got very peculiar tastes! Smylers
