Eric Wilhelm wrote: > I think that should always be the case. While I don't forsee needing to > do it differently, I think it's safe to assume: if we ever need to > break that for some reason, then it's a newer version of TAP. > > Taking that logic a step further, I vote YAGNI on the "complete syntax > for meta-information" bit. If we need more syntax, we bump the version > and continue on our merry way, right?
Right. > Is anybody itching for more metadata right now? Yes, but that's a wholly different thing and should not be lumped in with the TAP version.
