On Nov 28, 2007, at 2:44 PM, chromatic wrote:
Could we not add a feature to prove and/or runtests such that, any
arguments after a bare "--" will be passed on to the scripts it runs?
I've often wanted this myself, and --exec seems like overkill to me.
Seconded.
My only request would be that we not overload the meaning of --.
I could easily see, though:
prove -v t/ --testargs --db=test
which would be less ambiguous than
prove -v t/ -- --db=test
My only concern about any of this is that it opens the door for the "I
want to pass different arguments to different tests...."
--
Andy Lester => [EMAIL PROTECTED] => www.petdance.com => AIM:petdance
