A. Pagaltzis writes: > Hi Michael, > > * Michael G Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-12-04 03:35]: > > > use Test::More; > > pass(); > > plan tests => 2; > > pass(); > > > > Why shouldn't this work? > > ... this should be allowed: > > pass(); > plan 'no_plan'; > pass(); > > Whereas this should not: > > pass(); > plan tests => 2; > pass();
Why not? That's exactly what Schwern was suggesting should work. > > It also makes it technically possible to allow the test to change > > it's plan mid-stream > > Without some hypothetical future version of TAP this is only possible > if you have run tests before declaring a plan at all, because > otherwise the plan will already have been output as the first line of > the TAP stream. Wasn't there general agreement only a week or so ago to now allow plans to be specified at the end rather than the start? I was presuming that Schwern's suggestions were in the light of this other change. Smylers
