On 10/11/10 11:59, Bill Birthisel wrote: > 3. There is not really much of a problem (for users) with long names. It > appears MooseX:: is currently in common use on CPAN - so I would > recommend MooseX::MARC. That appears to be to clearest choice and the > one that fits the current naming patterns most closely.
MooseX is wrong. MooseX is the namespace for extensions to Moose such as new Types. This module should be in the MARC namespace. Something like MARC::NG is called for. Looking forward to using this, Frédéric, good idea Cheers Colin -- Colin Campbell Chief Software Engineer, PTFS Europe Limited Content Management and Library Solutions +44 (0) 208 366 1295 (phone) +44 (0) 7759 633626 (mobile) colin.campb...@ptfs-europe.com skype: colin_campbell2 http://www.ptfs-europe.com
