On Mon 01 Nov 2004 20:50, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes (via RT) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > # New Ticket Created by Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes > # Please include the string: [perl #32272] > # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. > # <URL: http://rt.perl.org:80/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=32272 > > > > This is a build failure report for perl from [EMAIL PROTECTED], > generated with the help of perlbug 1.35 running under perl v5.8.5. > > > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > [Please enter your report here] > > ext/Cwd/t/cwd.............................readdir(linktest/..): No such file or > directory at ../ext/Cwd/t/cwd.t line 151 > # Failed test (../ext/Cwd/t/cwd.t at line 151) > # '' > # doesn't match '(?-xism:t/_ptrslt_/_path_/_to_/_a_/_dir_$)'
Isn't that the same I reported from blead? It's different when running a manual as from a smoke or a make test_harness The othe failure was on line #164 IIRC This one went away if I symlinked cwt.t to perl_current/t > FAILED at test 21 > t/io/tell.................................FAILED at test 28 > ext/B/t/optree_specials...................# Failed at ./test.pl line 249 > # got 'BEGIN 1: > # b <1> leavesub[1 ref] K/REFC,1 ->(end) > # - <@> lineseq KP ->b > # 1 <;> nextstate(B::Concise -249 Concise.pm:306) v/2 ->2 > # 3 <1> require sK/1 ->4 > # 2 <$> const[PV "strict.pm"] s/BARE ->3 > # 4 <;> nextstate(B::Concise -249 Concise.pm:306) v/2 ->5 > # - <@> lineseq K ->- > # 5 <;> nextstate(B::Concise -249 Concise.pm:306) /2 ->6 > # a <1> entersub[t1] KS*/TARG,2 ->b > # 6 <0> pushmark s ->7 > # 7 <$> const[PV "strict"] sM ->8 > # 8 <$> const[PV "refs"] sM ->9 > # 9 <$> method_named[PVIV 1520340202] ->a > # BEGIN 2: > # m <1> leavesub[1 ref] K/REFC,1 ->(end) > # - <@> lineseq KP ->m > # c <;> nextstate(B::Concise -234 Concise.pm:329) v/2 ->d > # e <1> require sK/1 ->f > # d <$> const[PV "warnings.pm"] s/BARE ->e > # f <;> nextstate(B::Concise -234 Concise.pm:329) v/2 ->g > # - <@> lineseq K ->- > # g <;> nextstate(B::Concise -234 Concise.pm:329) /2 ->h > # l <1> entersub[t1] KS*/TARG,2 ->m > # h <0-e syntax OK > # > pushmark s ->i > # i <$> const[PV "warnings"] sM ->j > # j <$> const[PV "qw"] sM ->k > # k <$> method_named[PVIV 1520340202] ->l > # BEGIN 3: > # q <1> leavesub[1 ref] K/REFC,1 ->(end) > # - <@> lineseq KP ->q > # n <;> nextstate(main 2 -e:1) v ->o > # p <1> postinc[t3] sK/1 ->q > # - <1> ex-rv2sv sKRM/1 ->p > # o <#> gvsv[*beg] s ->p > # ' > # expected /(?ms-xi:^(-e .*?)?(B::Concise::compile.*?)? > # BEGIN 1: > # b <1> leavesub\[1 ref\] K/REFC,1 ->\(end\) > # - <\@> lineseq KP ->b > # 1 <;> (?:next|db)state(.*?) v/2 ->2 > # 3 <1> require sK/1 ->4 > # 2 <\$> const\[PV ".*?"\] s/BARE ->3 > # 4 <;> (?:next|db)state(.*?) v/2 ->5 > # - <\@> lineseq K ->- > # 5 <;> (?:next|db)state(.*?) /2 ->6 > # a <1> entersub\[t1\] KS\*/TARG,2 ->b > # 6 <0> pushmark s ->7 > # 7 <\$> const\[PV ".*?"\] sM ->8 > # 8 <\$> const\[PV ".*?"\] sM ->9 > # 9 <\$> method_named\[PVIV 1520340202\] ->a > # BEGIN 2: > # m <1> leavesub\[1 ref\] K/REFC,1 ->\(end\) > # - <\@> lineseq KP ->m > # c <;> (?:next|db)state(.*?) v/2 ->d > # e <1> require sK/1 ->f > # d <\$> const\[PV ".*?"\] s/BARE ->e > # f <;> (?:next|db)state(.*?) v/2 ->g > # - <\@> lineseq K ->- > # g <;> (?:next|db)state(.*?) /2 ->h > # l <1> entersub\[t1\] KS\*/TARG,2 ->m > # h <0> pushmark s ->i > # i <\$> const\[PV ".*?"\] sM ->j > # j <\$> const\[PV ".*?"\] sM ->k > # k <\$> method_named\[PVIV 1520340202\] ->l > # BEGIN 3: > # q <1> leavesub\[1 ref\] K/REFC,1 ->\(end\) > # - <\@> lineseq KP ->q > # n <;> (?:next|db)state(.*?) v ->o > # p <1> postinc\[t3\] sK/1 ->q > # - <1> ex-rv2sv sKRM/1 ->p > # o <\#> gvsv\[\*beg\] s ->p > # $)/ > FAILED at test 2 > Failed 3 test scripts out of 876, 99.66% okay. > > The io/tell doesn't concern me; it's a questionable test, and goes away > with PERLIO=perlio (or -Uusefaststdio). > > ext/Cwd/t/cwd turns out to happen with older perls with the Cwd from CPAN > but the test is disabled by default outside the core, which is strange > given that it is testing Cwd::_perl_abs_path, and not anything in the > perl code. Anyway, _perl_abs_path desperately needs some commenting; > I don't understand what it's trying to do or why it's not working on > cygwin for this test. > > ext/B/t/optree_specials seems to be expecting stderr/stdout to have a > particular order which isn't happening for me. -- H.Merijn Brand Amsterdam Perl Mongers (http://amsterdam.pm.org/) using perl-5.6.1, 5.8.5, & 5.9.x, and 809 on HP-UX 10.20 & 11.00, 11i, AIX 4.3, AIX 5.2, SuSE 9.1, and Win2k. http://www.cmve.net/~merijn/ http://archives.develooper.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] send smoke reports to: [EMAIL PROTECTED], QA: http://qa.perl.org
