Re: RFC 88: Possible problem with shared lexical scope.

[Chaim Frenkel]

>>>>> "PS" == Peter Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

PS> However, my memory as to what the current perl behavior is was faulty; 
PS> continue blocks do *not* share the lexical scope of their attached loop 
PS> blocks.  I was misremembering the caveat at the end of this part of perlsyn 
PS> (which says the opposite, and is easily confirmed):

I vaguely recall that Gurusamy fixed this one.

<chaim>
-- 
Chaim Frenkel                                        Nonlinear Knowledge, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]                                               +1-718-236-0183