On Thursday, November 21, 2002, at 04:41 PM, Andrew Wilson wrote:
Yep, that might happen. So the two above _might_ be legal, though I have a hard time thinking of a scenario in which it would be useful.On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 01:02:57PM -0800, Michael Lazzaro wrote:_01.23 # wrong 01.23_ # wrongIs _ not space eater, or was that not decided? If it is then aren't these two just literals with space eaters.
Note that the space-eating '_' wouldn't be part of the literal... it's a (pseudo?)operator on the literal, so the purely-literals tests should still mark the above as bad literal syntax.
MikeL